0.9.1.59:
[sbcl.git] / tests / type.pure.lisp
index 12af699..6a0351a 100644 (file)
            (nil (or number vector)            nil)
            (12  (or null vector)              nil)
            (12  (and (or number vector) real) t))))
+
+
+;;; This test is motivated by bug #195, which previously had (THE REAL
+;;; #(1 2 3)) give an error which prints as "This is not a (OR
+;;; SINGLE-FLOAT DOUBLE-FLOAT RATIONAL)".  We ideally want all of the
+;;; defined-by-ANSI types to unparse as themselves or at least
+;;; something similar (e.g. CHARACTER can unparse to BASE-CHAR, since
+;;; the types are equivalent in current SBCL, and EXTENDED-CHAR can
+;;; unparse to NIL, since there are no EXTENDED-CHARs currently).
+(let ((standard-types '(;; from table 4-2 in section 4.2.3 in the
+                       ;; CLHS.
+                       arithmetic-error
+                       function
+                       simple-condition           
+                       array
+                       generic-function
+                       simple-error
+                       atom
+                       hash-table
+                       simple-string              
+                       base-char
+                       integer
+                       simple-type-error          
+                       base-string
+                       keyword
+                       simple-vector              
+                       bignum
+                       list
+                       simple-warning             
+                       bit
+                       logical-pathname
+                       single-float               
+                       bit-vector
+                       long-float
+                       standard-char              
+                       broadcast-stream
+                       method
+                       standard-class             
+                       built-in-class
+                       method-combination
+                       standard-generic-function  
+                       cell-error
+                       nil
+                       standard-method            
+                       character
+                       null
+                       standard-object            
+                       class
+                       number
+                       storage-condition          
+                       compiled-function
+                       package
+                       stream                     
+                       complex
+                       package-error
+                       stream-error               
+                       concatenated-stream
+                       parse-error
+                       string                     
+                       condition
+                       pathname
+                       string-stream
+                       cons
+                       print-not-readable
+                       structure-class            
+                       control-error
+                       program-error
+                       structure-object           
+                       division-by-zero
+                       random-state
+                       style-warning              
+                       double-float
+                       ratio
+                       symbol                     
+                       echo-stream
+                       rational
+                       synonym-stream             
+                       end-of-file
+                       reader-error
+                       t                          
+                       error
+                       readtable
+                       two-way-stream
+                       extended-char
+                       real
+                       type-error                 
+                       file-error
+                       restart
+                       unbound-slot               
+                       file-stream
+                       sequence
+                       unbound-variable           
+                       fixnum
+                       serious-condition
+                       undefined-function         
+                       float
+                       short-float
+                       unsigned-byte              
+                       floating-point-inexact
+                       signed-byte
+                       vector                     
+                       floating-point-invalid-operation
+                       simple-array
+                       warning                    
+                       floating-point-overflow
+                       simple-base-string                             
+                       floating-point-underflow
+                       simple-bit-vector)))
+  (dolist (type standard-types)
+    (format t "~&~S~%" type)
+    (assert (not (sb-kernel:unknown-type-p (sb-kernel:specifier-type type))))
+    (assert (atom (sb-kernel:type-specifier (sb-kernel:specifier-type type))))))
+
+;;; a bug underlying the reported bug #221: The SB-KERNEL type code
+;;; signalled an error on this expression.
+(subtypep '(function (fixnum) (values package boolean))
+         '(function (t) (values package boolean)))
+
+;;; bug reported by Valtteri Vuorik
+(compile nil '(lambda () (member (char "foo" 0) '(#\. #\/) :test #'char=)))
+(assert (not (equal (multiple-value-list
+                     (subtypep '(function ()) '(function (&rest t))))
+                    '(nil t))))
+
+(assert (not (equal (multiple-value-list
+                     (subtypep '(function (&rest t)) '(function ())))
+                    '(t t))))
+
+(assert (subtypep '(function)
+                  '(function (&optional * &rest t))))
+(assert (equal (multiple-value-list
+                (subtypep '(function)
+                          '(function (t &rest t))))
+               '(nil t)))
+(assert (and (subtypep 'function '(function))
+             (subtypep '(function) 'function)))
+
+;;; Absent any exciting generalizations of |R, the type RATIONAL is
+;;; partitioned by RATIO and INTEGER.  Ensure that the type system
+;;; knows about this.  [ the type system is permitted to return NIL,
+;;; NIL for these, so if future maintenance breaks these tests that
+;;; way, that's fine.  What the SUBTYPEP calls are _not_ allowed to
+;;; return is NIL, T, because that's completely wrong. ]
+(assert (subtypep '(or integer ratio) 'rational))
+(assert (subtypep 'rational '(or integer ratio)))
+;;; Likewise, these are allowed to return NIL, NIL, but shouldn't
+;;; return NIL, T:
+(assert (subtypep t '(or real (not real))))
+(assert (subtypep t '(or keyword (not keyword))))
+(assert (subtypep '(and cons (not (cons symbol integer)))
+                 '(or (cons (not symbol) *) (cons * (not integer)))))
+(assert (subtypep '(or (cons (not symbol) *) (cons * (not integer)))
+                 '(and cons (not (cons symbol integer)))))
+(assert (subtypep '(or (eql 0) (rational (0) 10))
+                 '(rational 0 10)))
+(assert (subtypep '(rational 0 10)
+                 '(or (eql 0) (rational (0) 10))))
+;;; Until sbcl-0.7.13.7, union of CONS types when the CDRs were the
+;;; same type gave exceedingly wrong results
+(assert (null (subtypep '(or (cons fixnum single-float)
+                            (cons bignum single-float))
+                       '(cons single-float single-float))))
+(assert (subtypep '(cons integer single-float)
+                 '(or (cons fixnum single-float) (cons bignum single-float))))
+
+(assert (not (nth-value 1 (subtypep '(and null some-unknown-type)
+                                    'another-unknown-type))))
+
+;;; bug 46c
+(dolist (fun '(and if))
+  (assert (raises-error? (coerce fun 'function) type-error)))
+
+(dotimes (i 100)
+  (let ((x (make-array 0 :element-type `(unsigned-byte ,(1+ i)))))
+    (eval `(typep ,x (class-of ,x)))))
+
+(assert (not (typep #c(1 2) '(member #c(2 1)))))
+(assert (typep #c(1 2) '(member #c(1 2))))
+(assert (subtypep 'nil '(complex nil)))
+(assert (subtypep '(complex nil) 'nil))
+(assert (subtypep 'nil '(complex (eql 0))))
+(assert (subtypep '(complex (eql 0)) 'nil))
+(assert (subtypep 'nil '(complex (integer 0 0))))
+(assert (subtypep '(complex (integer 0 0)) 'nil))
+(assert (subtypep 'nil '(complex (rational 0 0))))
+(assert (subtypep '(complex (rational 0 0)) 'nil))
+(assert (subtypep 'complex '(complex real)))
+(assert (subtypep '(complex real) 'complex))
+(assert (subtypep '(complex (eql 1)) '(complex (member 1 2))))
+(assert (subtypep '(complex ratio) '(complex rational)))
+(assert (subtypep '(complex ratio) 'complex))
+(assert (equal (multiple-value-list
+               (subtypep '(complex (integer 1 2))
+                         '(member #c(1 1) #c(1 2) #c(2 1) #c(2 2))))
+              '(nil t)))
+
+(assert (typep 0 '(real #.(ash -1 10000) #.(ash 1 10000))))
+(assert (subtypep '(real #.(ash -1 1000) #.(ash 1 1000))
+                  '(real #.(ash -1 10000) #.(ash 1 10000))))
+(assert (subtypep '(real (#.(ash -1 1000)) (#.(ash 1 1000)))
+                  '(real #.(ash -1 1000) #.(ash 1 1000))))
+
+;;; Bug, found by Paul F. Dietz
+(let* ((x (eval #c(-1 1/2)))
+       (type (type-of x)))
+  (assert (subtypep type '(complex rational)))
+  (assert (typep x type)))
+
+;;; Test derivation of LOG{AND,IOR,XOR} bounds for unsigned arguments.
+;;;
+;;; Fear the Loop of Doom!
+(let* ((bits 5)
+       (size (ash 1 bits)))
+  (flet ((brute-force (a b c d op minimize)
+           (loop with extreme = (if minimize (ash 1 bits) 0)
+                 with collector = (if minimize #'min #'max)
+                 for i from a upto b do
+                 (loop for j from c upto d do
+                       (setf extreme (funcall collector
+                                              extreme
+                                              (funcall op i j))))
+                 finally (return extreme))))
+    (dolist (op '(logand logior logxor))
+      (dolist (minimize '(t nil))
+        (let ((deriver (intern (format nil "~A-DERIVE-UNSIGNED-~:[HIGH~;LOW~]-BOUND"
+                                       op minimize)
+                               (find-package :sb-c))))
+          (loop for a from 0 below size do
+                (loop for b from a below size do
+                      (loop for c from 0 below size do
+                            (loop for d from c below size do
+                                  (let* ((brute (brute-force a b c d op minimize))
+                                         (x-type (sb-c::specifier-type `(integer ,a ,b)))
+                                         (y-type (sb-c::specifier-type `(integer ,c ,d)))
+                                         (derived (funcall deriver x-type y-type)))
+                                    (unless (= brute derived)
+                                      (format t "FAIL: ~A [~D,~D] [~D,~D] ~A~%
+ACTUAL ~D DERIVED ~D~%"
+                                              op a b c d minimize brute derived)
+                                      (assert (= brute derived)))))))))))))