0.9.15.36: less intrusive step instrumentation
* INVOKE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD was missing a binding for the
effective-method-form, causing potential multiple evaluation and
also creating one source of confusion when step instrumenting CLOS
code, manifesting as:
Asserted type (MOD
536870911) conflicts with derived type
(VALUES (OR FUNCTION SB-PCL::METHOD-CALL SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD-CALL)
&OPTIONAL).
* If the form being instrumented is a call to a known single-valued
function we can instrument it in a way that doesn't kill the
type-inference. This alone is enough to get rid of most warnings
such as above.
* Add rudimentary (B)acktrace command to the built-in stepper.