0.7.7.10:

0.7.7.10:
	got rid of SB-PCL::PROCESS-LAMBDA-LIST in favor of reusing
		PARSE-LAMBDA-LIST
	Why is PARSE-LAMBDA-LIST in SB-KERNEL? Move it to SB-INT.
	Now that we rely on ordinary PARSE-LAMBDA-LIST to catch some
		of the things Alexey's PROCESS-LAMBDA-LIST caught,
		it should be a little less credulous about things
		like non-symbols being used as var names.
	Argh! PARSE-LAMBDA-LIST isn't just used for lambda lists. That
		would be too obvious.:-( Instead it's also used for
		"lambda-list-like" things, in PARSE-ARGS-TYPES. So...
	...Split the no-sanity-checking version of P-L-L into
		PARSE-LAMBDA-LIST-LIKE-THING.
	...Make PARSE-ARGS-TYPES call P-L-L-L-THING.
	...Define PARSE-LAMBDA-LIST in terms of P-L-L-L-THING.
	ANSI: MAX and MIN "should signal an error of type TYPE-ERROR
		if any NUMBER is not a REAL". lrasinen on #lisp:
		"stupid CMUCL". me: "gotta fix this so SBCL can win
		ICFP next year". (afterthought: "or this year, if
		you check this patched version out of CVS and then
		code really fast":-) (extra afterthought: "or maybe
		next year after all, since bug 194 seems to keep
		the new THEs from solving the problem")