- `(unwind-protect
- (let* ((*interrupts-enabled* nil)
- (*gc-inhibit* t))
- ,@body)
- (when (or (and *interrupts-enabled* *interrupt-pending*)
- (and (not *gc-inhibit*)
- (or *gc-pending* #!+sb-thread *stop-for-gc-pending*)))
- (sb!unix::receive-pending-interrupt))))
+ (with-unique-names (without-gcing-body)
+ `(flet ((,without-gcing-body ()
+ ,@body))
+ (if *gc-inhibit*
+ (,without-gcing-body)
+ (without-interrupts
+ ;; We need to disable interrupts before disabling GC, so that
+ ;; signal handlers using locks don't accidentally try to grab
+ ;; them with GC inhibited.
+ ;;
+ ;; It would be nice to implement this with just a single UWP, but
+ ;; unfortunately it seems that it cannot be done: the naive
+ ;; solution of binding both *INTERRUPTS-ENABLED* and
+ ;; *GC-INHIBIT*, and checking for both pending GC and interrupts
+ ;; in the cleanup breaks if we have a GC pending, but no
+ ;; interrupts, and we receive an asynch unwind while checking for
+ ;; the pending GC: we unwind before handling the pending GC, and
+ ;; will be left running with further GCs blocked due to the GC
+ ;; pending flag.
+ (unwind-protect
+ (let ((*gc-inhibit* t))
+ (,without-gcing-body))
+ (when (or *gc-pending* #!+sb-thread *stop-for-gc-pending*)
+ (sb!unix::receive-pending-interrupt))))))))