- ;; When we're cross-compiling, consider: what should we
- ;; do when we hit e.g.
- ;; (EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL)
- ;; (DEFUN FOO (X) (+ 7 X)))?
- ;; DEFUN has a macro definition in the cross-compiler,
- ;; and a different macro definition in the target
- ;; compiler. The only sensible thing is to use the
- ;; target compiler's macro definition, since the
- ;; cross-compiler's macro is in general into target
- ;; functions which can't meaningfully be executed at
- ;; cross-compilation time. So make sure we do the EVAL
- ;; here, before we macroexpand.
- ;;
- ;; Then things get even dicier with something like
- ;; (DEFCONSTANT-EQX SB!XC:LAMBDA-LIST-KEYWORDS ..)
- ;; where we have to make sure that we don't uncross
- ;; the SB!XC: prefix before we do EVAL, because otherwise
- ;; we'd be trying to redefine the cross-compilation host's
- ;; constants.
- ;;
- ;; (Isn't it fun to cross-compile Common Lisp?:-)
- #+sb-xc-host
- (progn
- (when compile-time-too
- (eval form)) ; letting xc host EVAL do its own macroexpansion
- (let* (;; (We uncross the operator name because things
- ;; like SB!XC:DEFCONSTANT and SB!XC:DEFTYPE
- ;; should be equivalent to their CL: counterparts
- ;; when being compiled as target code. We leave
- ;; the rest of the form uncrossed because macros
- ;; might yet expand into EVAL-WHEN stuff, and
- ;; things inside EVAL-WHEN can't be uncrossed
- ;; until after we've EVALed them in the
- ;; cross-compilation host.)
- (slightly-uncrossed (cons (uncross (first form))
- (rest form)))
- (expanded (preprocessor-macroexpand-1
- slightly-uncrossed)))
- (if (eq expanded slightly-uncrossed)
- ;; (Now that we're no longer processing toplevel
- ;; forms, and hence no longer need to worry about
- ;; EVAL-WHEN, we can uncross everything.)
- (convert-and-maybe-compile expanded path)
- ;; (We have to demote COMPILE-TIME-TOO to NIL
- ;; here, no matter what it was before, since
- ;; otherwise we'd tend to EVAL subforms more than
- ;; once, because of WHEN COMPILE-TIME-TOO form
- ;; above.)
- (process-toplevel-form expanded path nil))))
- ;; When we're not cross-compiling, we only need to
- ;; macroexpand once, so we can follow the 1-thru-6
- ;; sequence of steps in ANSI's "3.2.3.1 Processing of
- ;; Top Level Forms".
- #-sb-xc-host
- (let ((expanded (preprocessor-macroexpand-1 form)))
- (cond ((eq expanded form)
- (when compile-time-too
- (eval-in-lexenv form *lexenv*))
- (convert-and-maybe-compile form path))
- (t
- (process-toplevel-form expanded
- path
- compile-time-too))))))
+ (let ((*top-level-form-noted* (note-top-level-form form)))
+ ;; When we're cross-compiling, consider: what should we
+ ;; do when we hit e.g.
+ ;; (EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL)
+ ;; (DEFUN FOO (X) (+ 7 X)))?
+ ;; DEFUN has a macro definition in the cross-compiler,
+ ;; and a different macro definition in the target
+ ;; compiler. The only sensible thing is to use the
+ ;; target compiler's macro definition, since the
+ ;; cross-compiler's macro is in general into target
+ ;; functions which can't meaningfully be executed at
+ ;; cross-compilation time. So make sure we do the EVAL
+ ;; here, before we macroexpand.
+ ;;
+ ;; Then things get even dicier with something like
+ ;; (DEFCONSTANT-EQX SB!XC:LAMBDA-LIST-KEYWORDS ..)
+ ;; where we have to make sure that we don't uncross
+ ;; the SB!XC: prefix before we do EVAL, because otherwise
+ ;; we'd be trying to redefine the cross-compilation host's
+ ;; constants.
+ ;;
+ ;; (Isn't it fun to cross-compile Common Lisp?:-)
+ #+sb-xc-host
+ (progn
+ (when compile-time-too
+ (eval form)) ; letting xc host EVAL do its own macroexpansion
+ (let* (;; (We uncross the operator name because things
+ ;; like SB!XC:DEFCONSTANT and SB!XC:DEFTYPE
+ ;; should be equivalent to their CL: counterparts
+ ;; when being compiled as target code. We leave
+ ;; the rest of the form uncrossed because macros
+ ;; might yet expand into EVAL-WHEN stuff, and
+ ;; things inside EVAL-WHEN can't be uncrossed
+ ;; until after we've EVALed them in the
+ ;; cross-compilation host.)
+ (slightly-uncrossed (cons (uncross (first form))
+ (rest form)))
+ (expanded (preprocessor-macroexpand-1
+ slightly-uncrossed)))
+ (if (eq expanded slightly-uncrossed)
+ ;; (Now that we're no longer processing toplevel
+ ;; forms, and hence no longer need to worry about
+ ;; EVAL-WHEN, we can uncross everything.)
+ (convert-and-maybe-compile expanded path)
+ ;; (We have to demote COMPILE-TIME-TOO to NIL
+ ;; here, no matter what it was before, since
+ ;; otherwise we'd tend to EVAL subforms more than
+ ;; once, because of WHEN COMPILE-TIME-TOO form
+ ;; above.)
+ (process-toplevel-form expanded path nil))))
+ ;; When we're not cross-compiling, we only need to
+ ;; macroexpand once, so we can follow the 1-thru-6
+ ;; sequence of steps in ANSI's "3.2.3.1 Processing of
+ ;; Top Level Forms".
+ #-sb-xc-host
+ (let ((expanded (preprocessor-macroexpand-1 form)))
+ (cond ((eq expanded form)
+ (when compile-time-too
+ (eval-in-lexenv form *lexenv*))
+ (convert-and-maybe-compile form path))
+ (t
+ (process-toplevel-form expanded
+ path
+ compile-time-too)))))))
projects / sbcl.git / commitdiff