'(if (array-header-p %array)
(values (%array-data-vector %array) %index)
(values %array %index)))
-
-;;; transforms for getting at simple arrays of (UNSIGNED-BYTE N) when (< N 8)
-;;;
-;;; FIXME: In CMU CL, these were commented out with #+NIL. Why? Should
-;;; we fix them or should we delete them? (Perhaps these definitions
-;;; predate the various DATA-VECTOR-REF-FOO VOPs which have
-;;; (:TRANSLATE DATA-VECTOR-REF), and are redundant now?)
-#+nil
-(macrolet
- ((frob (type bits)
- (let ((elements-per-word (truncate sb!vm:n-word-bits bits)))
- `(progn
- (deftransform data-vector-ref ((vector index)
- (,type *))
- `(multiple-value-bind (word bit)
- (floor index ,',elements-per-word)
- (ldb ,(ecase sb!vm:target-byte-order
- (:little-endian '(byte ,bits (* bit ,bits)))
- (:big-endian '(byte ,bits (- sb!vm:n-word-bits
- (* (1+ bit) ,bits)))))
- (%vector-raw-bits vector word))))
- (deftransform data-vector-set ((vector index new-value)
- (,type * *))
- `(multiple-value-bind (word bit)
- (floor index ,',elements-per-word)
- (setf (ldb ,(ecase sb!vm:target-byte-order
- (:little-endian '(byte ,bits (* bit ,bits)))
- (:big-endian
- '(byte ,bits (- sb!vm:n-word-bits
- (* (1+ bit) ,bits)))))
- (%vector-raw-bits vector word))
- new-value)))))))
- (frob simple-bit-vector 1)
- (frob (simple-array (unsigned-byte 2) (*)) 2)
- (frob (simple-array (unsigned-byte 4) (*)) 4))
\f
;;;; BIT-VECTOR hackery