evaluated once (reported by Kevin Reid)
* bug fix: the :SHOW-PROGRESS keyword parameter to SB-SPROF:WITH-PROFILING
works again (thanks to Kilian Sprotte)
+ * bug fix: an error is signaled for tagbodies with duplicate tags
+ (thanks to Stephen Wilson)
+ * bug fix: NIL can be used as a tagbody tag (thanks to Stephen Wilson)
changes in sbcl-1.0.1 relative to sbcl-1.0:
* new platform: FreeBSD/x86-64, including support for threading.
;;; like (<tag> <form>* (go <next tag>)). That is, we break up the
;;; tagbody into segments of non-tag statements, and explicitly
;;; represent the drop-through with a GO. The first segment has a
-;;; dummy NIL tag, since it represents code before the first tag. The
+;;; dummy NIL tag, since it represents code before the first tag. Note
+;;; however that NIL may appear as the tag of an inner segment. The
;;; last segment (which may also be the first segment) ends in NIL
;;; rather than a GO.
(defun parse-tagbody (body)
(declare (list body))
- (collect ((segments))
- (let ((current (cons nil body)))
+ (collect ((tags)
+ (segments))
+ (let ((current body))
(loop
- (let ((tag-pos (position-if (complement #'listp) current :start 1)))
- (unless tag-pos
- (segments `(,@current nil))
- (return))
- (let ((tag (elt current tag-pos)))
- (when (assoc tag (segments))
- (compiler-error
- "The tag ~S appears more than once in the tagbody."
- tag))
- (unless (or (symbolp tag) (integerp tag))
- (compiler-error "~S is not a legal tagbody statement." tag))
- (segments `(,@(subseq current 0 tag-pos) (go ,tag))))
- (setq current (nthcdr tag-pos current)))))
- (segments)))
+ (let ((next-segment (member-if #'atom current)))
+ (unless next-segment
+ (segments `(,@current nil))
+ (return))
+ (let ((tag (car next-segment)))
+ (when (member tag (tags))
+ (compiler-error
+ "The tag ~S appears more than once in a tagbody."
+ tag))
+ (unless (or (symbolp tag) (integerp tag))
+ (compiler-error "~S is not a legal go tag." tag))
+ (tags tag)
+ (segments `(,@(ldiff current next-segment) (go ,tag))))
+ (setq current (rest next-segment))))
+ (mapcar #'cons (cons nil (tags)) (segments)))))
;;; Set up the cleanup, emitting the entry node. Then make a block for
;;; each tag, building up the tag list for LEXENV-TAGS as we go.
(ir1-convert
start next result
(with-unique-names (cleanup-fun drop-thru-tag exit-tag next start count)
- `(flet ((,cleanup-fun () ,@cleanup nil))
+ `(flet ((,cleanup-fun ()
+ ,@cleanup
+ nil))
;; FIXME: If we ever get DYNAMIC-EXTENT working, then
;; ,CLEANUP-FUN should probably be declared DYNAMIC-EXTENT,
;; and something can be done to make %ESCAPE-FUN have
(test-eval t '(if (true) t (oops)))
(test-eval nil '(if (not (if (false) t)) (oops)))
+;;; TAGBODY
+
+;;; As of SBCL 1.0.1.8, TAGBODY should not accept duplicate go tags,
+;;; yet choked on two duplicate tags. Note that this test asserts a
+;;; failure.
+(with-test (:name :tagbody-dual-go-tags)
+ (progn
+ (defun tagbody-dual-go-tags ()
+ (restart-case
+ (handler-bind ((error (lambda (c)
+ (declare (ignore c))
+ (invoke-restart 'NOT-AN-ERROR))))
+ (tagbody :A :A) nil)
+ (NOT-AN-ERROR () t)))
+ (assert (tagbody-dual-go-tags))))
+
+;;; Ensure that NIL is a valid go tag.
+(with-test (:name :tagbody-nil-is-valid-tag)
+ (progn
+ (defun tagbody-nil-is-valid-tag ()
+ (tagbody (go NIL) NIL) t)
+ (assert (tagbody-nil-is-valid-tag))))
+
;;; success