Is (1 . 1) of type CONS a cons? => NIL
without signalling an error.
+154:
+ There's some sort of problem with aborting back out of the debugger
+ after a %DETECT-STACK-EXHAUSTION error in sbcl-0.7.1.38. In some cases
+ telling the debugger to ABORT doesn't get you back to the main REPL,
+ but instead just gives you another stack exhaustion error. The problem
+ doesn't occur in the trivial case
+ * (defun frob () (frob) (frob))
+ FROB
+ * (frob)
+ but it has happened in more complicated cases (which I haven't
+ figured out how to reproduce).
DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS
IR1-#:
# Copy src/runtime/sbcl.h from the host system to the target system.
# On the target system:
# sh make-target-1.sh
-# Copy src/runtime/sbcl.nm from the target system to the host system.
+# Copy src/runtime/sbcl.nm and output/stuff-groveled-from-headers.lisp
+# from the target system to the host system.
# On the host system:
# SBCL_XC_HOST=<whatever> sh make-host-2.sh
# Copy output/cold-sbcl.core from the host system to the target system.
# On the target system:
# sh make-host-2.sh
+# Or, if you can set up the files somewhere shared (with NFS, AFS, or
+# whatever) between the host machine and the target machine, the basic
+# procedure above should still work, but you can skip the "copy" steps.
sh make-host-1.sh || exit 1
sh make-target-1.sh || exit 1
sh make-host-2.sh || exit 1
;;; for internal versions, especially for internal versions off the
;;; main CVS branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
-"0.7.1.43"
+"0.7.1.44"