1.0.11.17: fixed dumb buglet in DEFMACRO NAMED-LET

	Someone (jsnell?) on #lisp pointed out that there was still a
	#!+SB-DOC left behind after some clod deleted the corresponding
	doc string.:-|

	also a few comment tweaks

diff --git a/src/code/early-extensions.lisp b/src/code/early-extensions.lisp
index 68cf7c5..bfe8451 100644 (file)
--- a/src/code/early-extensions.lisp
+++ b/src/code/early-extensions.lisp
@@ -377,8 +377,8 @@
 
 ;;; not really an old-fashioned function, but what the calling
 ;;; convention should've been: like NTH, but with the same argument
-;;; order as in all the other dereferencing functions, with the
-;;; collection first and the index second
+;;; order as in all the other indexed dereferencing functions, with
+;;; the collection first and the index second
 (declaim (inline nth-but-with-sane-arg-order))
 (declaim (ftype (function (list index) t) nth-but-with-sane-arg-order))
 (defun nth-but-with-sane-arg-order (list index)
@@ -395,11 +395,12 @@
 \f
 ;;;; miscellaneous iteration extensions
 
-;;; "the ultimate iteration macro"
+;;; like Scheme's named LET
 ;;;
-;;; note for Schemers: This seems to be identical to Scheme's "named LET".
+;;; (CMU CL called this ITERATE, and commented it as "the ultimate
+;;; iteration macro...". I (WHN) found the old name insufficiently
+;;; specific to remind me what the macro means, so I renamed it.)
 (defmacro named-let (name binds &body body)
-  #!+sb-doc
   (dolist (x binds)
     (unless (proper-list-of-length-p x 2)
       (error "malformed NAMED-LET variable spec: ~S" x)))

diff --git a/version.lisp-expr b/version.lisp-expr
index 63b0325..46ffe81 100644 (file)
--- a/version.lisp-expr
+++ b/version.lisp-expr
@@ -17,4 +17,4 @@
 ;;; checkins which aren't released. (And occasionally for internal
 ;;; versions, especially for internal versions off the main CVS
 ;;; branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
-"1.0.11.16"
+"1.0.11.17"