;;; versions which break binary compatibility. But it certainly should
;;; be incremented for release versions which break binary
;;; compatibility.
-(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 45)
+(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 46)
;;; (record of versions before 2003 deleted in 2003-04-26/0.pre8.107 or so)
;;; 38: (2003-01-05) changed names of internal SORT machinery
;;; 39: (2003-02-20) in 0.7.12.1 a slot was added to
;;; .fasl files could never possibly ever refer to the SB-C
;;; CONTINUATION-related data types which were changed
;;; incompatibly in 0.8.3.62.
+;;; 46: (2003-11-11) Tim Daly, Jr. (and Christophe Rhodes) reported
+;;; .fasl incompatibility on sbcl-devel 2003-11-09.
;;; the conventional file extension for our fasl files
(declaim (type simple-string *fasl-file-type*))
;;; checkins which aren't released. (And occasionally for internal
;;; versions, especially for internal versions off the main CVS
;;; branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
-"0.8.5.32"
+"0.8.5.33"