1.0.42.26: tests: Fix broken :fails-on clause for a dynamic-extent.impure test

  * Test case dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / (:NO-CONSING
:HASH-TABLES) fails on threaded PPC targets, but because the
clause was not quoted, it evaluated to all threaded targets,
which was wrong.  My mistake, too.

  * Added NEWS entry forgotten in 1.0.42.23, also my mistake.

diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 2c12e6b..ad3cac1 100644 (file)
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ changes relative to sbcl-1.0.42
     (lp#598986, thanks to Stas Boukarev)
   * bug fix: the compiler occasionally inlined references from incompatible
     environments occurs. (lp#308951)
+  * bug fix: the compiler threw an error when trying to compile a local
+    function (labels or flet) known to take a specialized complex argument.
+    (not in launchpad, reported by sykopomp in #lispgames)
 
 changes in sbcl-1.0.42 relative to sbcl-1.0.41
 

diff --git a/tests/dynamic-extent.impure.lisp b/tests/dynamic-extent.impure.lisp
index be5ddbc..98d9966 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/dynamic-extent.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/dynamic-extent.impure.lisp
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@
 ;; This fails on threaded PPC because the hash-table implementation
 ;; uses recursive system spinlocks, which cons (see below for test
 ;; (:no-consing :spinlock), which also fails on threaded PPC).
-(with-test (:name (:no-consing :hash-tables) :fails-on (and :ppc :sb-thread))
+(with-test (:name (:no-consing :hash-tables) :fails-on '(and :ppc :sb-thread))
   (assert-no-consing (test-hash-table)))
 
 ;;; with-spinlock and with-mutex should use DX and not cons

diff --git a/version.lisp-expr b/version.lisp-expr
index 36b238e..05f749e 100644 (file)
--- a/version.lisp-expr
+++ b/version.lisp-expr
@@ -17,4 +17,4 @@
 ;;; checkins which aren't released. (And occasionally for internal
 ;;; versions, especially for internal versions off the main CVS
 ;;; branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
-"1.0.42.25"
+"1.0.42.26"