;;; Add complementary constraints to the consequent and alternative
;;; blocks of IF. We do nothing if X is NIL.
-(defun add-complement-constraints (if fun x y not-p constraints
- consequent-constraints
- alternative-constraints)
- (when (and x
- ;; Note: Even if we do (IF test exp exp) => (PROGN test exp)
- ;; optimization, the *MAX-OPTIMIZE-ITERATIONS* cutoff means
- ;; that we can't guarantee that the optimization will be
- ;; done, so we still need to avoid barfing on this case.
- (not (eq (if-consequent if)
- (if-alternative if))))
+(defun add-complement-constraints (fun x y not-p constraints
+ consequent-constraints
+ alternative-constraints)
+ (when x
(add-test-constraint fun x y not-p constraints
consequent-constraints)
(add-test-constraint fun x y (not not-p) constraints
;;; the test represented by USE.
(defun add-test-constraints (use if constraints)
(declare (type node use) (type cif if))
- (let ((consequent-constraints (make-sset))
- (alternative-constraints (make-sset)))
- (macrolet ((add (fun x y not-p)
- `(add-complement-constraints if ,fun ,x ,y ,not-p
- constraints
- consequent-constraints
- alternative-constraints)))
- (typecase use
- (ref
- (add 'typep (ok-lvar-lambda-var (ref-lvar use) constraints)
- (specifier-type 'null) t))
- (combination
- (unless (eq (combination-kind use)
- :error)
- (let ((name (lvar-fun-name
- (basic-combination-fun use)))
- (args (basic-combination-args use)))
- (case name
- ((%typep %instance-typep)
- (let ((type (second args)))
- (when (constant-lvar-p type)
- (let ((val (lvar-value type)))
+ ;; Note: Even if we do (IF test exp exp) => (PROGN test exp)
+ ;; optimization, the *MAX-OPTIMIZE-ITERATIONS* cutoff means that we
+ ;; can't guarantee that the optimization will be done, so we still
+ ;; need to avoid barfing on this case.
+ (unless (eq (if-consequent if) (if-alternative if))
+ (let ((consequent-constraints (make-sset))
+ (alternative-constraints (make-sset)))
+ (macrolet ((add (fun x y not-p)
+ `(add-complement-constraints ,fun ,x ,y ,not-p
+ constraints
+ consequent-constraints
+ alternative-constraints)))
+ (typecase use
+ (ref
+ (add 'typep (ok-lvar-lambda-var (ref-lvar use) constraints)
+ (specifier-type 'null) t))
+ (combination
+ (unless (eq (combination-kind use)
+ :error)
+ (let ((name (lvar-fun-name
+ (basic-combination-fun use)))
+ (args (basic-combination-args use)))
+ (case name
+ ((%typep %instance-typep)
+ (let ((type (second args)))
+ (when (constant-lvar-p type)
+ (let ((val (lvar-value type)))
+ (add 'typep
+ (ok-lvar-lambda-var (first args) constraints)
+ (if (ctype-p val)
+ val
+ (specifier-type val))
+ nil)))))
+ ((eq eql)
+ (let* ((arg1 (first args))
+ (var1 (ok-lvar-lambda-var arg1 constraints))
+ (arg2 (second args))
+ (var2 (ok-lvar-lambda-var arg2 constraints)))
+ ;; The code below assumes that the constant is the
+ ;; second argument in case of variable to constant
+ ;; comparision which is sometimes true (see source
+ ;; transformations for EQ, EQL and CHAR=). Fixing
+ ;; that would result in more constant substitutions
+ ;; which is not a universally good thing, thus the
+ ;; unnatural asymmetry of the tests.
+ (cond ((not var1)
+ (when var2
+ (add-test-constraint 'typep var2 (lvar-type arg1)
+ nil constraints
+ consequent-constraints)))
+ (var2
+ (add 'eql var1 var2 nil))
+ ((constant-lvar-p arg2)
+ (add 'eql var1 (ref-leaf (principal-lvar-use arg2))
+ nil))
+ (t
+ (add-test-constraint 'typep var1 (lvar-type arg2)
+ nil constraints
+ consequent-constraints)))))
+ ((< >)
+ (let* ((arg1 (first args))
+ (var1 (ok-lvar-lambda-var arg1 constraints))
+ (arg2 (second args))
+ (var2 (ok-lvar-lambda-var arg2 constraints)))
+ (when var1
+ (add name var1 (lvar-type arg2) nil))
+ (when var2
+ (add (if (eq name '<) '> '<) var2 (lvar-type arg1) nil))))
+ (t
+ (let ((ptype (gethash name *backend-predicate-types*)))
+ (when ptype
(add 'typep (ok-lvar-lambda-var (first args) constraints)
- (if (ctype-p val)
- val
- (specifier-type val))
- nil)))))
- ((eq eql)
- (let* ((var1 (ok-lvar-lambda-var (first args) constraints))
- (arg2 (second args))
- (var2 (ok-lvar-lambda-var arg2 constraints)))
- (cond ((not var1))
- (var2
- (add 'eql var1 var2 nil))
- ((constant-lvar-p arg2)
- (add 'eql var1 (ref-leaf (principal-lvar-use arg2))
- nil)))))
- ((< >)
- (let* ((arg1 (first args))
- (var1 (ok-lvar-lambda-var arg1 constraints))
- (arg2 (second args))
- (var2 (ok-lvar-lambda-var arg2 constraints)))
- (when var1
- (add name var1 (lvar-type arg2) nil))
- (when var2
- (add (if (eq name '<) '> '<) var2 (lvar-type arg1) nil))))
- (t
- (let ((ptype (gethash name *backend-predicate-types*)))
- (when ptype
- (add 'typep (ok-lvar-lambda-var (first args) constraints)
- ptype nil))))))))))
- (values consequent-constraints alternative-constraints)))
+ ptype nil))))))))))
+ (values consequent-constraints alternative-constraints))))
;;;; Applying constraints