;;; versions which break binary compatibility. But it certainly should
;;; be incremented for release versions which break binary
;;; compatibility.
-(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 59)
+(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 60)
;;; (record of versions before 2003 deleted in 2003-04-26/0.pre8.107 or so)
;;; 38: (2003-01-05) changed names of internal SORT machinery
;;; 39: (2003-02-20) in 0.7.12.1 a slot was added to
;;; 58: (2005-08-16) Multiple incompatible changes between 0.9.3 and 0.9.3.60
;;; 59: (2005-09-18) METAOBJECT implementation, removal of INSTANCE and
;;; FUNCALLABLE-INSTANCE classes.
+;;; 60: (2005-10-24) Bumped for 0.9.6
;;; the conventional file extension for our fasl files
(declaim (type simple-string *fasl-file-type*))
;;; checkins which aren't released. (And occasionally for internal
;;; versions, especially for internal versions off the main CVS
;;; branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
-"0.9.5.84"
+"0.9.5.85"