;;; versions which break binary compatibility. But it certainly should
;;; be incremented for release versions which break binary
;;; compatibility.
-(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 74)
+(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 75)
;;; (description of versions before 0.9.0.1 deleted in 0.9.17)
;;; 56: (2005-05-22) Something between 0.9.0.1 and 0.9.0.14. My money is
;;; on 0.9.0.6 (MORE CASE CONSISTENCY).
;;; 72: (2006-12-05) Added slot to the primitive function type
;;; 73: (2007-04-13) Changed a hash function
;;; 74: (2007-06-05) UNWIND-TO-FRAME-AND-CALL
+;;; 75: (2007-08-06) FD-STREAM layout changes
;;; the conventional file extension for our fasl files
(declaim (type simple-string *fasl-file-type*))
;;; checkins which aren't released. (And occasionally for internal
;;; versions, especially for internal versions off the main CVS
;;; branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
-"1.0.8.16"
+"1.0.8.17"