;;; After the metabraid has been setup, and the protocol for defining
;;; classes has been defined, the real definition of LOAD-DEFCLASS is
;;; installed by the file std-class.lisp
-(defmacro defclass (name direct-superclasses direct-slots &rest options)
- (expand-defclass name direct-superclasses direct-slots options))
-
-(defun expand-defclass (name supers slots options)
- (setq supers (copy-tree supers)
- slots (copy-tree slots)
- options (copy-tree options))
+(defmacro defclass (name %direct-superclasses %direct-slots &rest %options)
+ (setq supers (copy-tree %direct-superclasses)
+ slots (copy-tree %direct-slots)
+ options (copy-tree %options))
(let ((metaclass 'standard-class))
(dolist (option options)
(if (not (listp option))
(mapcar #'(lambda (option)
(canonicalize-defclass-option name option))
options))
+ ;; FIXME: What does this flag mean?
(defstruct-p (and (eq *boot-state* 'complete)
(let ((mclass (find-class metaclass nil)))
(and mclass
(when defstruct-p
'(:from-defclass-p t))
other-initargs)))))))
- ;; FIXME: The way that we do things like (EVAL DEFCLASS-FORM)
- ;; here is un-ANSI-Common-Lisp-y and leads to problems
- ;; (like DEFUN for the type predicate being called more than
- ;; once when we do DEFCLASS at the interpreter prompt),
- ;; causing bogus style warnings. It would be better to
- ;; rewrite this so that the macroexpansion looks like e.g.
- ;; (PROGN
- ;; (EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL :LOAD-TOPLEVEL :EXECUTE)
- ;; (FROB1 ..))
- ;; (EVAL-WHEN (:LOAD-TOPLEVEL :EXECUTE)
- ;; (FROB2 ..)))
(if defstruct-p
(progn
- (eval defclass-form) ; Define the class now, so that..
- `(progn ; ..the defstruct can be compiled.
- ,(class-defstruct-form (find-class name))
- ,defclass-form))
- (progn
- (when (eq *boot-state* 'complete)
- ;; FIXME: MNA (on sbcl-devel 2001-05-30) reported
- ;; (if I understand correctly -- WHN) that this call
- ;; is directly responsible for defining
- ;; class-predicates which always return
- ;; CONSTANTLY-NIL in the compile-time environment,
- ;; and is indirectly responsible for bogus warnings
- ;; about redefinitions when making definitions in
- ;; the interpreter. I didn't like his fix (deleting
- ;; the call) since I think the type system *should*
- ;; be informed about class definitions here. And I'm
- ;; not eager to look too deeply into this sort of
- ;; done-too-many-times-in-the-interpreter problem
- ;; right now, since it should be easier to make a
- ;; clean fix when EVAL-WHEN is made more ANSI (as
- ;; per the IR1 section in the BUGS file). But
- ;; at some point this should be cleaned up.
- (inform-type-system-about-std-class name))
- defclass-form)))))))
+ ;; FIXME: The ANSI way to do this is with EVAL-WHEN
+ ;; forms, not by side-effects at macroexpansion time.
+ ;; But I (WHN 2001-09-02) am not even sure how to
+ ;; reach this code path with ANSI (or art-of-the-MOP)
+ ;; code, so I haven't tried to update it, since for
+ ;; all I know maybe it could just be deleted instead.
+ (eval defclass-form) ; Define the class now, so that..
+ `(progn ; ..the defstruct can be compiled.
+ ,(class-defstruct-form (find-class name))
+ ,defclass-form))
+ `(progn
+ ;; By telling the type system at compile time about
+ ;; the existence of a class named NAME, we can avoid
+ ;; various bogus warnings about "type isn't defined yet".
+ ,(when (and
+ ;; But it's not so important to get rid of
+ ;; "not defined yet" warnings during
+ ;; bootstrapping, and machinery like
+ ;; INFORM-TYPE-SYSTEM-ABOUT-STD-CLASS
+ ;; mightn't be defined yet. So punt then.
+ (eq *boot-state* 'complete)
+ ;; And although we know enough about
+ ;; STANDARD-CLASS, and ANSI imposes enough
+ ;; restrictions on the user overloading its
+ ;; methods, that (1) we can shortcut the
+ ;; method dispatch and do an ordinary
+ ;; function call, and (2) be sure we're getting
+ ;; it right even when we do it at compile
+ ;; time; we don't in general know how to do
+ ;; that for other classes. So punt then too.
+ (eq metaclass 'standard-class))
+ `(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
+ (inform-type-system-about-std-class ',name)))
+ ,defclass-form)))))))
(defun make-initfunction (initform)
(declare (special *initfunctions*))