Minor non-behavioural fixes that are in the way of my thought
process.
;;; (2003-05-27) used in SBCL at all.
(declaim (ftype (function (string &rest t) nil) compiler-error compiler-abort))
(declaim (ftype (function (string &rest t) (values))
- compiler-warning compiler-style-warning))
+ compiler-warn compiler-style-warn))
(defun compiler-abort (format-string &rest format-args)
(error 'compiler-error
:format-control format-string
;; hardwired to be empty. And SBCL doesn't have GENGC (and as
;; far as I know no modern CMU CL does either -- WHN
;; 2001-10-05). So might we be able to get rid of trace tables?
+ ;;
+ ;; Note that gencgc also does something with the trace table.
;; Dump the constants, noting any :ENTRY constants that have to
;; be patched.
;;; checkins which aren't released. (And occasionally for internal
;;; versions, especially for internal versions off the main CVS
;;; branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
-"0.8.10.21"
+"0.8.10.22"