When is a GO tag not a GO tag?
... remove stray "p" from midst of commentary :-)
;; nothing to do, then emit a nop. ### Note: despite the
;; fact that this is a loop, it really won't work for
;; repetitions other then zero and one. For example, if
-p ;; the branch has two dependents and one of them dpends on
+ ;; the branch has two dependents and one of them dpends on
;; the other, then the stuff that grabs a dependent could
;; easily grab the wrong one. But I don't feel like fixing
;; this because it doesn't matter for any of the
;;; checkins which aren't released. (And occasionally for internal
;;; versions, especially for internal versions off the main CVS
;;; branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
-"0.8.2.48"
+"0.8.2.49"