* enhancement: The error message when calling an undefined alien function
includes the name of the function on x86-64.
* enhancement: sb-ext:run-program now supports :environment on Windows.
+ * enhancement: ASDF is no longer required to load contribs at runtime.
+ (lp#1132254)
* bug fix: forward references to classes in fasls can now be loaded.
(lp#746132)
* bug fix: don't warn on a interpreted->compiled function redefinition
(Reported by Douglas Katzman)
* bug fix: run-prorgram performs more correct escaping of arguments on
Windows. (lp#1239242)
+ * bug fix: function-lambda-expression on generic functions returns the
+ actual name.
changes in sbcl-1.1.12 relative to sbcl-1.1.11:
* enhancement: Add sb-bsd-sockets:socket-shutdown, for calling
class)))
(defun fun-name (x)
- (if (typep x 'generic-function)
+ (if (typep x 'standard-generic-function)
(sb-pcl:generic-function-name x)
(%fun-name x)))
+;;;; the ANSI interface to function names (and to other stuff too)
+;;; Note: this function gets called by the compiler (as of 1.0.17.x,
+;;; in MAYBE-INLINE-SYNTACTIC-CLOSURE), and so although ANSI says
+;;; we're allowed to return NIL here freely, it seems plausible that
+;;; small changes to the circumstances under which this function
+;;; returns non-NIL might have subtle consequences on the compiler.
+;;; So it might be desirable to have the compiler not rely on this
+;;; function, eventually.
+(defun function-lambda-expression (fun)
+ #+sb-doc
+ "Return (VALUES DEFINING-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION CLOSURE-P NAME), where
+ DEFINING-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION is NIL if unknown, or a suitable argument
+ to COMPILE otherwise, CLOSURE-P is non-NIL if the function's definition
+ might have been enclosed in some non-null lexical environment, and
+ NAME is some name (for debugging only) or NIL if there is no name."
+ (declare (type function fun))
+ (etypecase fun
+ #+sb-eval
+ (sb-eval:interpreted-function
+ (let ((name (sb-eval:interpreted-function-name fun))
+ (lambda-list (sb-eval:interpreted-function-lambda-list fun))
+ (declarations (sb-eval:interpreted-function-declarations fun))
+ (body (sb-eval:interpreted-function-body fun)))
+ (values `(lambda ,lambda-list
+ ,@(when declarations `((declare ,@declarations)))
+ ,@body)
+ t name)))
+ (function
+ (let* ((name (fun-name fun))
+ (fun (%simple-fun-self (%fun-fun fun)))
+ (code (sb-di::fun-code-header fun))
+ (info (sb-kernel:%code-debug-info code)))
+ (if info
+ (let ((source (sb-c::debug-info-source info)))
+ (cond ((and (sb-c::debug-source-form source)
+ (eq (sb-c::debug-source-function source) fun))
+ (values (sb-c::debug-source-form source)
+ nil
+ name))
+ ((legal-fun-name-p name)
+ (let ((exp (fun-name-inline-expansion name)))
+ (values exp (not exp) name)))
+ (t
+ (values nil t name))))
+ (values nil t name))))))
+
;;; Prints X on a single line, limiting output length by *PRINT-RIGHT-MARGIN*
;;; -- good for printing object parts, etc.
(defun prin1-to-line (x &key (columns 1) (reserve 0))
;;;; files for more information.
(in-package "SB!IMPL")
-\f
-;;;; function names and documentation
-
-;;;; the ANSI interface to function names (and to other stuff too)
-;;; Note: this function gets called by the compiler (as of 1.0.17.x,
-;;; in MAYBE-INLINE-SYNTACTIC-CLOSURE), and so although ANSI says
-;;; we're allowed to return NIL here freely, it seems plausible that
-;;; small changes to the circumstances under which this function
-;;; returns non-NIL might have subtle consequences on the compiler.
-;;; So it might be desirable to have the compiler not rely on this
-;;; function, eventually.
-(defun function-lambda-expression (fun)
- "Return (VALUES DEFINING-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION CLOSURE-P NAME), where
- DEFINING-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION is NIL if unknown, or a suitable argument
- to COMPILE otherwise, CLOSURE-P is non-NIL if the function's definition
- might have been enclosed in some non-null lexical environment, and
- NAME is some name (for debugging only) or NIL if there is no name."
- (declare (type function fun))
- (etypecase fun
- #!+sb-eval
- (sb!eval:interpreted-function
- (let ((name (sb!eval:interpreted-function-name fun))
- (lambda-list (sb!eval:interpreted-function-lambda-list fun))
- (declarations (sb!eval:interpreted-function-declarations fun))
- (body (sb!eval:interpreted-function-body fun)))
- (values `(lambda ,lambda-list
- ,@(when declarations `((declare ,@declarations)))
- ,@body)
- t name)))
- (function
- (let* ((fun (%simple-fun-self (%fun-fun fun)))
- (name (%fun-name fun))
- (code (sb!di::fun-code-header fun))
- (info (sb!kernel:%code-debug-info code)))
- (if info
- (let ((source (sb!c::debug-info-source info)))
- (cond ((and (sb!c::debug-source-form source)
- (eq (sb!c::debug-source-function source) fun))
- (values (sb!c::debug-source-form source)
- nil
- name))
- ((legal-fun-name-p name)
- (let ((exp (fun-name-inline-expansion name)))
- (values exp (not exp) name)))
- (t
- (values nil t name))))
- (values nil t name))))))
-
;;;; Generalizing over SIMPLE-FUN, CLOSURE, and FUNCALLABLE-INSTANCEs
;;; Underlying SIMPLE-FUN
;;; while we're at it, much the same applies to
;;; FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION:
(defun fle-fun (x) x)
-(function-lambda-expression #'fle-fun)
(let ((x 1)) (defun fle-closure (y) (if y (setq x y) x)))
-(function-lambda-expression #'fle-closure)
-#+sb-eval
-(progn
- ;; Nor should it fail on interpreted functions
- (let ((sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret))
- (eval `(defun fle-eval (x) x))
- (function-lambda-expression #'fle-eval))
+(with-test (:name :function-lambda-expression)
+ (flet ((fle-name (x)
+ (nth-value 2 (function-lambda-expression x))))
+ (assert (eql (fle-name #'fle-fun) 'fle-fun))
+ (assert (eql (fle-name #'fle-closure) 'fle-closure))
+ (assert (eql (fle-name #'disassemble-generic) 'disassemble-generic))
+ (function-lambda-expression
+ (sb-mop:make-instance 'sb-mop:funcallable-standard-object))
+ #+sb-eval
+ (progn
+ (let ((sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret))
+ (eval `(defun fle-eval (x) x))
+ (assert (eql (fle-name #'fle-eval) 'fle-eval)))
+
+ ;; fle-eval should still be an interpreted function.
+ (assert (sb-eval:interpreted-function-p #'fle-eval)))))
- ;; fle-eval should still be an interpreted function.
- (assert (sb-eval:interpreted-function-p #'fle-eval)))
-
-;; nor should it fail on generic functions or other funcallable instances
-(defgeneric fle-generic (x))
-(function-lambda-expression #'fle-generic)
-(let ((fin (sb-mop:make-instance 'sb-mop:funcallable-standard-object)))
- (function-lambda-expression fin))
\f
;;; support for DESCRIBE tests
(defstruct to-be-described a b)