1.0.4.6:
authorWilliam Harold Newman <william.newman@airmail.net>
Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:20:38 +0000 (16:20 +0000)
committerWilliam Harold Newman <william.newman@airmail.net>
Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:20:38 +0000 (16:20 +0000)
commit0a7604d54581d2c846838c26ce6a7993629586fa
tree46f6c1bf04d2f206e03a997fad21d201e38be004
parent7fe6593d72990d1dacc1d68aee2b909866c9d3c7
1.0.4.6:
rewrote RANDOM for INTEGER case to eliminate (small) bias
Alas, it doesn't seem practical to test this properly. (Difficulty
of building a nice test suite seems to be a pervasive
problem for randomized code.) I could write a test case
narrowly targeted to detect the old bug, but I don't
think I could make even that single test simultaneously
fast enough and reliable enough that it would be
a good candidate for run-tests.sh. And aiming at a
more comprehensive set of tests just makes the
making-it-fast-enough problem that much harder.
NEWS
build-order.lisp-expr
package-data-list.lisp-expr
src/code/random.lisp
src/code/target-random.lisp
src/compiler/float-tran.lisp
src/compiler/fndb.lisp
src/compiler/integer-tran.lisp [new file with mode: 0644]
version.lisp-expr