other reasons, e.g. because they were moved elsewhere).
-KNOWN BUGS OF NO SPECIAL CLASS:
-
2:
DEFSTRUCT almost certainly should overwrite the old LAYOUT information
instead of just punting when a contradictory structure definition
program, even if you know or guess enough about the internals of
SBCL to wager that this (undefined in ANSI) operation would be safe.
-3:
+3: "type checking of structure slots"
+ a:
ANSI specifies that a type mismatch in a structure slot
initialization value should not cause a warning.
WORKAROUND:
Such code should compile without complaint and work correctly either
on SBCL or on any other completely compliant Common Lisp system.
-6:
- bogus warnings about undefined functions for magic functions like
- SB!C::%%DEFUN and SB!C::%DEFCONSTANT when cross-compiling files
- like src/code/float.lisp. Fixing this will probably require
- straightening out enough bootstrap consistency issues that
- the cross-compiler can run with *TYPE-SYSTEM-INITIALIZED*.
- Instead, the cross-compiler runs in a slightly flaky state
- which is sane enough to compile SBCL itself, but which is
- also unstable in several ways, including its inability
- to really grok function declarations.
+ b: &AUX argument in a boa-constructor without a default value means
+ "do not initilize this slot" and does not cause type error. But
+ an error may be signalled at read time and it would be good if
+ SBCL did it.
+
+ d: (fixed in 0.8.1.5)
7:
The "compiling top-level form:" output ought to be condensed.
Perhaps any number of such consecutive lines ought to turn into a
single "compiling top-level forms:" line.
-10:
- The way that the compiler munges types with arguments together
- with types with no arguments (in e.g. TYPE-EXPAND) leads to
- weirdness visible to the user:
- (DEFTYPE FOO () 'FIXNUM)
- (TYPEP 11 'FOO) => T
- (TYPEP 11 '(FOO)) => T, which seems weird
- (TYPEP 11 'FIXNUM) => T
- (TYPEP 11 '(FIXNUM)) signals an error, as it should
- The situation is complicated by the presence of Common Lisp types
- like UNSIGNED-BYTE (which can either be used in list form or alone)
- so I'm not 100% sure that the behavior above is actually illegal.
- But I'm 90+% sure, and the following related behavior,
- (TYPEP 11 'AND) => T
- treating the bare symbol AND as equivalent to '(AND), is specifically
- forbidden (by the ANSI specification of the AND type).
-
-11:
- It would be nice if the
- caught ERROR:
- (during macroexpansion)
- said what macroexpansion was at fault, e.g.
- caught ERROR:
- (during macroexpansion of IN-PACKAGE,
- during macroexpansion of DEFFOO)
-
-15:
- (SUBTYPEP '(FUNCTION (T BOOLEAN) NIL)
- '(FUNCTION (FIXNUM FIXNUM) NIL)) => T, T
- (Also, when this is fixed, we can enable the code in PROCLAIM which
- checks for incompatible FTYPE redeclarations.)
-
19:
(I *think* this is a bug. It certainly seems like strange behavior. But
the ANSI spec is scary, dark, and deep.. -- WHN)
(FORMAT NIL "~,1G" 1.4) => "1. "
(FORMAT NIL "~3,1G" 1.4) => "1. "
-20:
- from Marco Antoniotti on cmucl-imp mailing list 1 Mar 2000:
- (defclass ccc () ())
- (setf (find-class 'ccc1) (find-class 'ccc))
- (defmethod zut ((c ccc1)) 123)
- In sbcl-0.7.1.13, this gives an error,
- There is no class named CCC1.
- DTC's recommended workaround from the mailing list 3 Mar 2000:
- (setf (pcl::find-class 'ccc1) (pcl::find-class 'ccc))
-
27:
Sometimes (SB-EXT:QUIT) fails with
Argh! maximum interrupt nesting depth (4096) exceeded, exiting
then executing
(FOO 1.5)
will cause the INTEGERP case to be selected, giving bogus output a la
- exactly 1.33..
+ exactly 2.5
This violates the "declarations are assertions" principle.
According to the ANSI spec, in the section "System Class FUNCTION",
this is a case of "lying to the compiler", but the lying is done
(Also, verify that the compiler handles declared function
return types as assertions.)
-41:
- TYPEP of VALUES types is sometimes implemented very inefficiently, e.g. in
- (DEFTYPE INDEXOID () '(INTEGER 0 1000))
- (DEFUN FOO (X)
- (DECLARE (TYPE INDEXOID X))
- (THE (VALUES INDEXOID)
- (VALUES X)))
- where the implementation of the type check in function FOO
- includes a full call to %TYPEP. There are also some fundamental problems
- with the interpretation of VALUES types (inherited from CMU CL, and
- from the ANSI CL standard) as discussed on the cmucl-imp@cons.org
- mailing list, e.g. in Robert Maclachlan's post of 21 Jun 2000.
-
42:
The definitions of SIGCONTEXT-FLOAT-REGISTER and
%SET-SIGCONTEXT-FLOAT-REGISTER in x86-vm.lisp say they're not
so they could be supported after all. Very likely
SIGCONTEXT-FLOATING-POINT-MODES could now be supported, too.
-43:
- (as discussed by Douglas Crosher on the cmucl-imp mailing list ca.
- Aug. 10, 2000): CMUCL currently interprets 'member as '(member); same
- issue with 'union, 'and, 'or etc. So even though according to the
- ANSI spec, bare 'MEMBER, 'AND, and 'OR are not legal types, CMUCL
- (and now SBCL) interpret them as legal types.
-
-45:
- a slew of floating-point-related errors reported by Peter Van Eynde
- on July 25, 2000:
- b: SBCL's value for LEAST-POSITIVE-SHORT-FLOAT is bogus, and
- should probably be 1.4012985e-45. In SBCL,
- (/ LEAST-POSITIVE-SHORT-FLOAT 2) returns a number smaller
- than LEAST-POSITIVE-SHORT-FLOAT. Similar problems
- exist for LEAST-NEGATIVE-SHORT-FLOAT, LEAST-POSITIVE-LONG-FLOAT,
- and LEAST-NEGATIVE-LONG-FLOAT.
- c: Many expressions generate floating infinity on x86/Linux:
- (/ 1 0.0)
- (/ 1 0.0d0)
- (EXPT 10.0 1000)
- (EXPT 10.0d0 1000)
- PVE's regression tests want them to raise errors. sbcl-0.7.0.5
- on x86/Linux generates the infinities instead. That might or
- might not be conforming behavior, but it's also inconsistent,
- which is almost certainly wrong. (Inconsistency: (/ 1 0.0)
- should give the same result as (/ 1.0 0.0), but instead (/ 1 0.0)
- generates SINGLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY and (/ 1.0 0.0)
- signals an error.
- d: (in section12.erg) various forms a la
- (FLOAT 1 DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON)
- don't give the right behavior.
-
-46:
- type safety errors reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
- a: (COERCE (QUOTE (A B C)) (QUOTE (VECTOR * 4)))
- => #(A B C)
- In general lengths of array type specifications aren't
- checked by COERCE, so it fails when the spec is
- (VECTOR 4), (STRING 2), (SIMPLE-BIT-VECTOR 3), or whatever.
- b: CONCATENATE has the same problem of not checking the length
- of specified output array types. MAKE-SEQUENCE and MAP and
- MERGE also have the same problem.
- c: (COERCE 'AND 'FUNCTION) returns something related to
- (MACRO-FUNCTION 'AND), but ANSI says it should raise an error.
- h: (MAKE-CONCATENATED-STREAM (MAKE-STRING-OUTPUT-STREAM))
- should signal TYPE-ERROR.
- i: MAKE-TWO-WAY-STREAM doesn't check that its arguments can
- be used for input and output as needed. It should fail with
- TYPE-ERROR when handed e.g. the results of
- MAKE-STRING-INPUT-STREAM or MAKE-STRING-OUTPUT-STREAM in
- the inappropriate positions, but doesn't.
- k: READ-BYTE is supposed to signal TYPE-ERROR when its argument is
- not a binary input stream, but instead cheerfully reads from
- character streams, e.g. (MAKE-STRING-INPUT-STREAM "abc").
-
-47:
- DEFCLASS bugs reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
- a: (DEFCLASS FOO () (A B A)) should signal a PROGRAM-ERROR, and
- doesn't.
- b: (DEFCLASS FOO () (A B A) (:DEFAULT-INITARGS X A X B)) should
- signal a PROGRAM-ERROR, and doesn't.
- c: (DEFCLASS FOO07 NIL ((A :ALLOCATION :CLASS :ALLOCATION :CLASS))),
- and other DEFCLASS forms with duplicate specifications in their
- slots, should signal a PROGRAM-ERROR, and doesn't.
- d: (DEFGENERIC IF (X)) should signal a PROGRAM-ERROR, but instead
- causes a COMPILER-ERROR.
-
-48:
- SYMBOL-MACROLET bugs reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
- a: (SYMBOL-MACROLET ((T TRUE)) ..) should probably signal
- PROGRAM-ERROR, but SBCL accepts it instead.
- b: SYMBOL-MACROLET should refuse to bind something which is
- declared as a global variable, signalling PROGRAM-ERROR.
- c: SYMBOL-MACROLET should signal PROGRAM-ERROR if something
- it binds is declared SPECIAL inside.
-
-51:
- miscellaneous errors reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
- a: (PROGN
- (DEFGENERIC FOO02 (X))
- (DEFMETHOD FOO02 ((X NUMBER)) T)
- (LET ((M (FIND-METHOD (FUNCTION FOO02)
- NIL
- (LIST (FIND-CLASS (QUOTE NUMBER))))))
- (REMOVE-METHOD (FUNCTION FOO02) M)
- (DEFGENERIC FOO03 (X))
- (ADD-METHOD (FUNCTION FOO03) M)))
- should give an error, but SBCL allows it.
- b: READ should probably return READER-ERROR, not the bare
- arithmetic error, when input a la "1/0" or "1e1000" causes
- an arithmetic error.
-
-52:
- It has been reported (e.g. by Peter Van Eynde) that there are
- several metaobject protocol "errors". (In order to fix them, we might
- need to document exactly what metaobject protocol specification
- we're following -- the current code is just inherited from PCL.)
-
-54:
- The implementation of #'+ returns its single argument without
- type checking, e.g. (+ "illegal") => "illegal".
-
60:
The debugger LIST-LOCATIONS command doesn't work properly.
+ (How should it work properly?)
61:
Compiling and loading
then requesting a BACKTRACE at the debugger prompt gives no information
about where in the user program the problem occurred.
-62:
- The compiler is supposed to do type inference well enough that
- the declaration in
- (TYPECASE X
- ((SIMPLE-ARRAY SINGLE-FLOAT)
- (LOCALLY
- (DECLARE (TYPE (SIMPLE-ARRAY SINGLE-FLOAT) X))
- ..))
- ..)
- is redundant. However, as reported by Juan Jose Garcia Ripoll for
- CMU CL, it sometimes doesn't. Adding declarations is a pretty good
- workaround for the problem for now, but can't be done by the TYPECASE
- macros themselves, since it's too hard for the macro to detect
- assignments to the variable within the clause.
- Note: The compiler *is* smart enough to do the type inference in
- many cases. This case, derived from a couple of MACROEXPAND-1
- calls on Ripoll's original test case,
- (DEFUN NEGMAT (A)
- (DECLARE (OPTIMIZE SPEED (SAFETY 0)))
- (COND ((TYPEP A '(SIMPLE-ARRAY SINGLE-FLOAT)) NIL
- (LET ((LENGTH (ARRAY-TOTAL-SIZE A)))
- (LET ((I 0) (G2554 LENGTH))
- (DECLARE (TYPE REAL G2554) (TYPE REAL I))
- (TAGBODY
- SB-LOOP::NEXT-LOOP
- (WHEN (>= I G2554) (GO SB-LOOP::END-LOOP))
- (SETF (ROW-MAJOR-AREF A I) (- (ROW-MAJOR-AREF A I)))
- (GO SB-LOOP::NEXT-LOOP)
- SB-LOOP::END-LOOP))))))
- demonstrates the problem; but the problem goes away if the TAGBODY
- and GO forms are removed (leaving the SETF in ordinary, non-looping
- code), or if the TAGBODY and GO forms are retained, but the
- assigned value becomes 0.0 instead of (- (ROW-MAJOR-AREF A I)).
-
-63:
- Paul Werkowski wrote on cmucl-imp@cons.org 2000-11-15
- I am looking into this problem that showed up on the cmucl-help
- list. It seems to me that the "implementation specific environment
- hacking functions" found in pcl/walker.lisp are completely messed
- up. The good thing is that they appear to be barely used within
- PCL and the munged environment object is passed to cmucl only
- in calls to macroexpand-1, which is probably why this case fails.
- SBCL uses essentially the same code, so if the environment hacking
- is screwed up, it affects us too.
+ (this is apparently mostly fixed on the SPARC and PPC architectures:
+ while giving the backtrace the system complains about "unknown
+ source location: using block start", but apart from that the
+ backtrace seems reasonable. See tests/debug.impure.lisp for a test
+ case)
64:
Using the pretty-printer from the command prompt gives funny
the new output block should start indented 2 or more characters
rightward of the correct location.
-65:
- (probably related to bug #70; maybe related to bug #109)
- As reported by Carl Witty on submit@bugs.debian.org 1999-05-08,
- compiling this file
-(in-package "CL-USER")
-(defun equal-terms (termx termy)
- (labels
- ((alpha-equal-bound-term-lists (listx listy)
- (or (and (null listx) (null listy))
- (and listx listy
- (let ((bindings-x (bindings-of-bound-term (car listx)))
- (bindings-y (bindings-of-bound-term (car listy))))
- (if (and (null bindings-x) (null bindings-y))
- (alpha-equal-terms (term-of-bound-term (car listx))
- (term-of-bound-term (car listy)))
- (and (= (length bindings-x) (length bindings-y))
- (prog2
- (enter-binding-pairs (bindings-of-bound-term (car listx))
- (bindings-of-bound-term (car listy)))
- (alpha-equal-terms (term-of-bound-term (car listx))
- (term-of-bound-term (car listy)))
- (exit-binding-pairs (bindings-of-bound-term (car listx))
- (bindings-of-bound-term (car listy)))))))
- (alpha-equal-bound-term-lists (cdr listx) (cdr listy)))))
-
- (alpha-equal-terms (termx termy)
- (if (and (variable-p termx)
- (variable-p termy))
- (equal-bindings (id-of-variable-term termx)
- (id-of-variable-term termy))
- (and (equal-operators-p (operator-of-term termx) (operator-of-term termy))
- (alpha-equal-bound-term-lists (bound-terms-of-term termx)
- (bound-terms-of-term termy))))))
-
- (or (eq termx termy)
- (and termx termy
- (with-variable-invocation (alpha-equal-terms termx termy))))))
- causes an assertion failure
- The assertion (EQ (C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET C::CALLER)
- (C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET (C::LAMBDA-HOME C::CALLEE))) failed.
-
- Bob Rogers reports (1999-07-28 on cmucl-imp@cons.org) a smaller test
- case with the same problem:
-(defun parse-fssp-alignment ()
- ;; Given an FSSP alignment file named by the argument . . .
- (labels ((get-fssp-char ()
- (get-fssp-char))
- (read-fssp-char ()
- (get-fssp-char)))
- ;; Stub body, enough to tickle the bug.
- (list (read-fssp-char)
- (read-fssp-char))))
-
-66:
- ANSI specifies that the RESULT-TYPE argument of CONCATENATE must be
- a subtype of SEQUENCE, but CONCATENATE doesn't check this properly:
- (CONCATENATE 'SIMPLE-ARRAY #(1 2) '(3)) => #(1 2 3)
- This also leads to funny behavior when derived type specifiers
- are used, as originally reported by Milan Zamazal for CMU CL (on the
- Debian bugs mailing list (?) 2000-02-27), then reported by Martin
- Atzmueller for SBCL (2000-10-01 on sbcl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net):
- (DEFTYPE FOO () 'SIMPLE-ARRAY)
- (CONCATENATE 'FOO #(1 2) '(3))
- => #<ARRAY-TYPE SIMPLE-ARRAY> is a bad type specifier for
- sequence functions.
- The derived type specifier FOO should act the same way as the
- built-in type SIMPLE-ARRAY here, but it doesn't. That problem
- doesn't seem to exist for sequence types:
- (DEFTYPE BAR () 'SIMPLE-VECTOR)
- (CONCATENATE 'BAR #(1 2) '(3)) => #(1 2 3)
-
67:
As reported by Winton Davies on a CMU CL mailing list 2000-01-10,
and reported for SBCL by Martin Atzmueller 2000-10-20: (TRACE GETHASH)
crashes SBCL. In general tracing anything which is used in the
implementation of TRACE is likely to have the same problem.
-70:
- (probably related to bug #65; maybe related to bug #109)
- The compiler doesn't like &OPTIONAL arguments in LABELS and FLET
- forms. E.g.
- (DEFUN FIND-BEFORE (ITEM SEQUENCE &KEY (TEST #'EQL))
- (LABELS ((FIND-ITEM (OBJ SEQ TEST &OPTIONAL (VAL NIL))
- (LET ((ITEM (FIRST SEQ)))
- (COND ((NULL SEQ)
- (VALUES NIL NIL))
- ((FUNCALL TEST OBJ ITEM)
- (VALUES VAL SEQ))
- (T
- (FIND-ITEM OBJ (REST SEQ) TEST (NCONC VAL `(,ITEM))))))))
- (FIND-ITEM ITEM SEQUENCE TEST)))
- from David Young's bug report on cmucl-help@cons.org 30 Nov 2000
- causes sbcl-0.6.9 to fail with
- error in function SB-KERNEL:ASSERT-ERROR:
- The assertion (EQ (SB-C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET SB-C::CALLER)
- (SB-C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET
- (SB-C::LAMBDA-HOME SB-C::CALLEE))) failed.
-
-72:
- (DECLAIM (OPTIMIZE ..)) doesn't work properly inside LOCALLY forms.
-
-75:
- As reported by Martin Atzmueller on sbcl-devel 26 Dec 2000,
- ANSI says that WITH-OUTPUT-TO-STRING should have a keyword
- :ELEMENT-TYPE, but in sbcl-0.6.9 this is not defined for
- WITH-OUTPUT-TO-STRING.
-
78:
ANSI says in one place that type declarations can be abbreviated even
when the type name is not a symbol, e.g.
e-mail on cmucl-help@cons.org on 2001-01-16 and 2001-01-17 from WHN
and Pierre Mai.)
-79:
- as pointed out by Dan Barlow on sbcl-devel 2000-07-02:
- The PICK-TEMPORARY-FILE-NAME utility used by LOAD-FOREIGN uses
- an easily guessable temporary filename in a way which might open
- applications using LOAD-FOREIGN to hijacking by malicious users
- on the same machine. Incantations for doing this safely are
- floating around the net in various "how to write secure programs
- despite Unix" documents, and it would be good to (1) fix this in
- LOAD-FOREIGN, and (2) hunt for any other code which uses temporary
- files and make it share the same new safe logic.
-
-82:
- Functions are assigned names based on the context in which they're
- defined. This is less than ideal for the functions which are
- used to implement CLOS methods. E.g. the output of
- (DESCRIBE 'PRINT-OBJECT) lists functions like
- #<FUNCTION "DEF!STRUCT (TRACE-INFO (:MAKE-LOAD-FORM-FUN SB-KERNEL:JUST-DUMP-IT-NORMALLY) (:PRINT-OBJECT #))" {1020E49}>
- and
- #<FUNCTION "MACROLET ((FORCE-DELAYED-DEF!METHODS NIL #))" {1242871}>
- It would be better if these functions' names always identified
- them as methods, and identified their generic functions and
- specializers.
-
83:
RANDOM-INTEGER-EXTRA-BITS=10 may not be large enough for the RANDOM
RNG to be high quality near RANDOM-FIXNUM-MAX; it looks as though
(I haven't tried to investigate this bug enough to guess whether
there might be any user-level symptoms.)
-90:
- a latent cross-compilation/bootstrapping bug: The cross-compilation
- host's CL:CHAR-CODE-LIMIT is used in target code in readtable.lisp
- and possibly elsewhere. Instead, we should use the target system's
- CHAR-CODE-LIMIT. This will probably cause problems if we try to
- bootstrap on a system which uses a different value of CHAR-CODE-LIMIT
- than SBCL does.
-
-94a:
- Inconsistencies between derived and declared VALUES return types for
- DEFUN aren't checked very well. E.g. the logic which successfully
- catches problems like
- (declaim (ftype (function (fixnum) float) foo))
- (defun foo (x)
- (declare (type integer x))
- (values x)) ; wrong return type, detected, gives warning, good!
- fails to catch
- (declaim (ftype (function (t) (values t t)) bar))
- (defun bar (x)
- (values x)) ; wrong number of return values, no warning, bad!
- The cause of this is seems to be that (1) the internal function
- VALUES-TYPES-EQUAL-OR-INTERSECT used to make the check handles its
- arguments symmetrically, and (2) when the type checking code was
- written back when when SBCL's code was still CMU CL, the intent
- was that this case
- (declaim (ftype (function (t) t) bar))
- (defun bar (x)
- (values x x)) ; wrong number of return values; should give warning?
- not be warned for, because a two-valued return value is considered
- to be compatible with callers who expects a single value to be
- returned. That intent is probably not appropriate for modern ANSI
- Common Lisp, but fixing this might be complicated because of other
- divergences between auld-style and new-style handling of
- multiple-VALUES types. (Some issues related to this were discussed
- on cmucl-imp at some length sometime in 2000.)
+ In fact, the type system is likely to depend on this inequality not
+ holding... * is not equivalent to T in many cases, such as
+ (VECTOR *) /= (VECTOR T).
95:
The facility for dumping a running Lisp image to disk gets confused
GC, so that thereafter memory usage can never be reduced below that
level.
-96:
- The TRACE facility can't be used on some kinds of functions.
- (Basically, the breakpoint facility was incompletely implemented
- in the X86 port of CMU CL, and hasn't been fixed in SBCL.)
+ (As of 0.8.7.3 it's likely that the latter half of this bug is fixed.
+ The interaction between gencgc and the variables used by
+ save-lisp-and-die is still nonoptimal, though, so no respite from
+ big core files yet)
98:
In sbcl-0.6.11.41 (and in all earlier SBCL, and in CMU
so the compiler doesn't compile the type test into code, but
instead just saves the type in a lexical closure and interprets it
at runtime.
- A proper solution involves deciding whether it's really worth
- saving space by implementing structure slot accessors as closures.
- (If it's not worth it, the problem vanishes automatically. If it
- is worth it, there are hacks we could use to force type tests to
- be compiled anyway, and even shared. E.g. we could implement
- an EQUAL hash table mapping from types to compiled type tests,
- and save the appropriate compiled type test as part of each lexical
- closure; or we could make the lexical closures be placeholders
- which overwrite their old definition as a lexical closure with
- a new compiled definition the first time that they're called.)
- As a workaround for the problem, #'(SETF FOO) expressions can
- be replaced with (EFFICIENT-SETF-FUNCTION FOO), where
+ To exercise the problem, compile and load
+ (cl:in-package :cl-user)
+ (defstruct foo
+ (bar (error "missing") :type bar))
+ (defvar *foo*)
+ (defun wastrel1 (x)
+ (loop (setf (foo-bar *foo*) x)))
+ (defstruct bar)
+ (defvar *bar* (make-bar))
+ (defvar *foo* (make-foo :bar *bar*))
+ (defvar *setf-foo-bar* #'(setf foo-bar))
+ (defun wastrel2 (x)
+ (loop (funcall *setf-foo-bar* x *foo*)))
+ then run (WASTREL1 *BAR*) or (WASTREL2 *BAR*), hit Ctrl-C, and
+ use BACKTRACE, to see it's spending all essentially all its time
+ in %TYPEP and VALUES-SPECIFIER-TYPE and so forth.
+ One possible solution would be simply to give up on
+ representing structure slot accessors as functions, and represent
+ them as macroexpansions instead. This can be inconvenient for users,
+ but it's not clear that it's worse than trying to help by expanding
+ into a horribly inefficient implementation.
+ As a workaround for the problem, #'(SETF FOO) expressions
+ can be replaced with (EFFICIENT-SETF-FUNCTION FOO), where
(defmacro efficient-setf-function (place-function-name)
- (or #+sbcl (and (sb-impl::info :function :accessor-for place-function-name)
+ (or #+sbcl (and (sb-int:info :function :accessor-for place-function-name)
;; a workaround for the problem, encouraging the
;; inline expansion of the structure accessor, so
;; that the compiler can optimize its type test
the first time around, until regression tests are written I'm not
comfortable merging the patches in the CVS version of SBCL.
-102:
- As reported by Arthur Lemmens sbcl-devel 2001-05-05, ANSI
- requires that SYMBOL-MACROLET refuse to rebind special variables,
- but SBCL doesn't do this. (Also as reported by AL in the same
- message, SBCL depended on this nonconforming behavior to build
- itself, because of the way that **CURRENT-SEGMENT** was implemented.
- As of sbcl-0.7.3.x, this dependence on the nonconforming behavior
- has been fixed, but the nonconforming behavior remains.)
-
-104:
- (DESCRIBE 'SB-ALIEN:DEF-ALIEN-TYPE) reports the macro argument list
- incorrectly:
- DEF-ALIEN-TYPE is
- an external symbol
- in #<PACKAGE "SB-ALIEN">.
- Macro-function: #<FUNCTION "DEF!MACRO DEF-ALIEN-TYPE" {19F4A39}>
- Macro arguments: (#:whole-470 #:environment-471)
- On Sat, May 26, 2001 09:45:57 AM CDT it was compiled from:
- /usr/stuff/sbcl/src/code/host-alieneval.lisp
- Created: Monday, March 12, 2001 07:47:43 AM CST
-
108:
(TIME (ROOM T)) reports more than 200 Mbytes consed even for
a clean, just-started SBCL system. And it seems to be right:
time trying to GC afterwards. Surely there's some more economical
way to implement (ROOM T).
-109:
- reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
- collection:
- ;;; This file fails to compile.
- ;;; Maybe this bug is related to bugs #65, #70 in the BUGS file.
- (in-package :cl-user)
- (defun tst2 ()
- (labels
- ((eff (&key trouble)
- (eff)
- ;; nil
- ;; Uncomment and it works
- ))
- (eff)))
- In SBCL 0.6.12.42, the problem is
- internal error, failed AVER:
- "(COMMON-LISP:EQ (SB!C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET SB!C::CALLER)
- (SB!C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET (SB!C::LAMBDA-HOME SB!C::CALLEE)))"
-
-110:
- reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
- collection:
- ;;; The compiler is flushing the argument type test, and the default
- ;;; case in the cond, so that calling with say a fixnum 0 causes a
- ;;; SIGBUS.
- (declaim (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
- (defun tst (x)
- (declare (type (or string stream) x))
- (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
- ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
- (t
- 'none)))
- The symptom in sbcl-0.6.12.42 on OpenBSD is actually (TST 0)=>STREAM
- (not the SIGBUS reported in the comment) but that's broken too;
- type declarations are supposed to be treated as assertions unless
- SAFETY 0, so we should be getting a TYPE-ERROR.
-
-113:
- reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
- collection:
- (in-package :cl-user)
- ;;; From: David Gadbois <gadbois@cyc.com>
- ;;;
- ;;; Logical pathnames aren't externalizable.
- ;;; Test case:
- (let ((tempfile "/tmp/test.lisp"))
- (setf (logical-pathname-translations "XXX")
- '(("XXX:**;*.*" "/tmp/**/*.*")))
- (with-open-file (out tempfile :direction :output)
- (write-string "(defvar *path* #P\"XXX:XXX;FOO.LISP\")" out))
- (compile-file tempfile))
- The error message in sbcl-0.6.12.42 is
- ; caught ERROR:
- ; (while making load form for #<SB-IMPL::LOGICAL-HOST "XXX">)
- ; A logical host can't be dumped as a constant: #<SB-IMPL::LOGICAL-HOST "XXX">
-
-115:
- reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
- collection:
- (in-package :cl-user)
- ;;; The following invokes a compiler error.
- (declaim (optimize (speed 2) (debug 3)))
- (defun tst ()
- (flet ((m1 ()
- (unwind-protect nil)))
- (if (catch nil)
- (m1)
- (m1))))
- The error message in sbcl-0.6.12.42 is
- internal error, failed AVER:
- "(COMMON-LISP:EQ (SB!C::TN-ENVIRONMENT SB!C:TN) SB!C::TN-ENV)"
+ Daniel Barlow doesn't know what fixed this, but observes that it
+ doesn't seem to be the case in 0.8.7.3 any more. Instead, (ROOM T)
+ in a fresh SBCL causes
+
+ debugger invoked on a SB-INT:BUG in thread 5911:
+ failed AVER: "(SAP= CURRENT END)"
+
+ unless a GC has happened beforehand.
117:
When the compiler inline expands functions, it may be that different
your pre-0.7.0 state of grace with
#+sbcl (declaim (notinline find position find-if position-if)) ; bug 117..
-118:
- as reported by Eric Marsden on cmucl-imp@cons.org 2001-08-14:
- (= (FLOAT 1 DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON)
- (+ (FLOAT 1 DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON) DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON)) => T
- when of course it should be NIL. (He says it only fails for X86,
- not SPARC; dunno about Alpha.)
-
- Also, "the same problem exists for LONG-FLOAT-EPSILON,
- DOUBLE-FLOAT-NEGATIVE-EPSILON, LONG-FLOAT-NEGATIVE-EPSILON (though
- for the -negative- the + is replaced by a - in the test)."
-
- Raymond Toy comments that this is tricky on the X86 since its FPU
- uses 80-bit precision internally.
-
-120a:
- The compiler incorrectly figures the return type of
- (DEFUN FOO (FRAME UP-FRAME)
- (IF (OR (NOT FRAME)
- T)
- FRAME
- "BAR"))
- as NIL.
-
- This problem exists in CMU CL 18c too. When I reported it on
- cmucl-imp@cons.org, Raymond Toy replied 23 Aug 2001 with
- a partial explanation, but no fix has been found yet.
-
-120b:
- Even in sbcl-0.pre7.x, which is supposed to be free of the old
- non-ANSI behavior of treating the function return type inferred
- from the current function definition as a declaration of the
- return type from any function of that name, the return type of NIL
- is attached to FOO in 120a above, and used to optimize code which
- calls FOO.
-
-122:
- There was some sort of screwup in handling of
- (IF (NOT (IGNORE-ERRORS ..))). E.g.
- (defun foo1i ()
- (if (not (ignore-errors
- (make-pathname :host "foo" :directory "!bla" :name "bar")))
- (print "ok")
- (error "notunlessnot")))
- The (NOT (IGNORE-ERRORS ..)) form evaluates to T, so this should be
- printing "ok", but instead it's going to the ERROR. This problem
- seems to've been introduced by MNA's HANDLER-CASE patch (sbcl-devel
- 2001-07-17) and as a workaround (put in sbcl-0.pre7.14.flaky4.12)
- I reverted back to the old weird HANDLER-CASE code. However, I
- think the problem looks like a compiler bug in handling RETURN-FROM,
- so I left the MNA-patched code in HANDLER-CASE (suppressed with
- #+NIL) and I'd like to go back to see whether this really is
- a compiler bug before I delete this BUGS entry.
-
-123:
- The *USE-IMPLEMENTATION-TYPES* hack causes bugs, particularly
- (IN-PACKAGE :SB-KERNEL)
- (TYPE= (SPECIFIER-TYPE '(VECTOR T))
- (SPECIFIER-TYPE '(VECTOR UNDEFTYPE)))
- Then because of this, the compiler bogusly optimizes
- (TYPEP #(11) '(SIMPLE-ARRAY UNDEF-TYPE 1))
- to T. Unfortunately, just setting *USE-IMPLEMENTATION-TYPES* to
- NIL around sbcl-0.pre7.14.flaky4.12 didn't work: the compiler complained
- about type mismatches (probably harmlessly, another instance of bug 117);
- and then cold init died with a segmentation fault.
+ (see also bug 279)
124:
As of version 0.pre7.14, SBCL's implementation of MACROLET makes
the entire lexical environment at the point of MACROLET available
- in the bodies of the macroexpander functions. In particular, it
- allows the function bodies (which run at compile time) to try to
+ in the bodies of the macroexpander functions. In particular, it
+ allows the function bodies (which run at compile time) to try to
access lexical variables (which are only defined at runtime).
It doesn't even issue a warning, which is bad.
-
+
The SBCL behavior arguably conforms to the ANSI spec (since the
spec says that the behavior is undefined, ergo anything conforms).
However, it would be better to issue a compile-time error.
the local macro definitions in a MACROLET, but the consequences
are undefined if the local macro definitions reference any
local variable or function bindings that are visible in that
- lexical environment.
+ lexical environment.
Then it seems to contradict itself by giving the example
(defun foo (x flag)
(macrolet ((fudge (z)
but actual specification quoted above says that the actual behavior
is undefined.
+ (Since 0.7.8.23 macroexpanders are defined in a restricted version
+ of the lexical environment, containing no lexical variables and
+ functions, which seems to conform to ANSI and CLtL2, but signalling
+ a STYLE-WARNING for references to variables similar to locals might
+ be a good thing.)
+
125:
(as reported by Gabe Garza on cmucl-help 2001-09-21)
(defvar *tmp* 3)
Evidently Python thinks of the lambda as a code transformation so
much that it forgets that it's also an object.
-127:
- The DEFSTRUCT section of the ANSI spec, in the :CONC-NAME section,
- specifies a precedence rule for name collisions between slot accessors of
- structure classes related by inheritance. As of 0.7.0, SBCL still
- doesn't follow it.
-
-129:
- insufficient syntax checking in MACROLET:
- (defun foo (x)
- (macrolet ((defmacro bar (z) `(+ z z)))
- (bar x)))
- shouldn't compile without error (because of the extra DEFMACRO symbol).
-
-131:
- As of sbcl-0.pre7.86.flaky7.3, the cross-compiler, and probably
- the CL:COMPILE function (which is based on the same %COMPILE
- mechanism) get confused by
-(defun sxhash (x)
- (labels ((sxhash-number (x)
- (etypecase x
- (fixnum (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (integer (sb!bignum:sxhash-bignum x))
- (single-float (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (double-float (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- #!+long-float (long-float (error "stub: no LONG-FLOAT"))
- (ratio (let ((result 127810327))
- (declare (type fixnum result))
- (mixf result (sxhash-number (numerator x)))
- (mixf result (sxhash-number (denominator x)))
- result))
- (complex (let ((result 535698211))
- (declare (type fixnum result))
- (mixf result (sxhash-number (realpart x)))
- (mixf result (sxhash-number (imagpart x)))
- result))))
- (sxhash-recurse (x &optional (depthoid +max-hash-depthoid+))
- (declare (type index depthoid))
- (typecase x
- (list
- (if (plusp depthoid)
- (mix (sxhash-recurse (car x) (1- depthoid))
- (sxhash-recurse (cdr x) (1- depthoid)))
- 261835505))
- (instance
- (if (typep x 'structure-object)
- (logxor 422371266
- (sxhash ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (class-name (layout-class (%instance-layout x)))))
- 309518995))
- (symbol (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (number (sxhash-number x))
- (array
- (typecase x
- (simple-string (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (string (%sxhash-substring x))
- (bit-vector (let ((result 410823708))
- (declare (type fixnum result))
- (dotimes (i (min depthoid (length x)))
- (mixf result (aref x i)))
- result))
- (t (logxor 191020317 (sxhash (array-rank x))))))
- (character
- (logxor 72185131
- (sxhash (char-code x)))) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (t 42))))
- (sxhash-recurse x)))
- complaining "function called with two arguments, but wants exactly
- one" about SXHASH-RECURSE. (This might not be strictly a new bug,
- since IIRC post-fork CMU CL has also had problems with &OPTIONAL
- arguments in FLET/LABELS: it might be an old Python bug which is
- only exercised by the new arrangement of the SBCL compiler.)
-
135:
Ideally, uninterning a symbol would allow it, and its associated
- FDEFINITION and PROCLAIM data, to be reclaimed by the GC. However,
+ FDEFINITION and PROCLAIM data, to be reclaimed by the GC. However,
at least as of sbcl-0.7.0, this isn't the case. Information about
FDEFINITIONs and PROCLAIMed properties is stored in globaldb.lisp
essentially in ordinary (non-weak) hash tables keyed by symbols.
Thus, once a system has an entry in this system, it tends to live
forever, even when it is uninterned and all other references to it
- are lost.
-
-136:
- (reported by Arnaud Rouanet on cmucl-imp 2001-12-18)
- (defmethod foo ((x integer))
- x)
- (defmethod foo :around ((x integer))
- (let ((x (1+ x)))
- (call-next-method)))
- Now (FOO 3) should return 3, but instead it returns 4.
-
-137:
- (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE) output should start with something
- including the name BACKTRACE, not (as in 0.pre7.88)
- just "0: (\"hairy arg processor\" ...)". Until about
- sbcl-0.pre7.109, the names in BACKTRACE were all screwed
- up compared to the nice useful names in sbcl-0.6.13.
- Around sbcl-0.pre7.109, they were mostly fixed by using
- NAMED-LAMBDA to implement DEFUN. However, there are still
- some screwups left, e.g. as of sbcl-0.pre7.109, there are
- still some functions named "hairy arg processor" and
- "SB-INT:&MORE processor".
-
-141:
- Pretty-printing nested backquotes doesn't work right, as
- reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-01-13:
- * '``(FOO ,@',@S)
- ``(FOO SB-IMPL::BACKQ-COMMA-AT S)
- * (lisp-implementation-version)
- "0.pre7.129"
-
-142:
- (as reported by Lynn Quam on cmucl-imp ca. 2002-01-16)
- %NATURALIZE-C-STRING conses a lot, like 16 bytes per byte
- of the naturalized string. We could probably port the patches
- from the cmucl-imp mailing list.
+ are lost.
143:
(reported by Jesse Bouwman 2001-10-24 through the unfortunately
under OpenBSD 2.9 on my X86 laptop. Do be patient when you try it:
it took more than two minutes (but less than five) for me.
-144:
- (This was once known as IR1-4, but it lived on even after the
- IR1 interpreter went to the big bit bucket in the sky.)
- The system accepts DECLAIM in most places where DECLARE would be
- accepted, without even issuing a warning. ANSI allows this, but since
- it's fairly easy to mistype DECLAIM instead of DECLARE, and the
- meaning is rather different, and it's unlikely that the user
- has a good reason for doing DECLAIM not at top level, it would be
- good to issue a STYLE-WARNING when this happens. A possible
- fix would be to issue STYLE-WARNINGs for DECLAIMs not at top level,
- or perhaps to issue STYLE-WARNINGs for any EVAL-WHEN not at top level.
- [This is considered an IR1-interpreter-related bug because until
- EVAL-WHEN is rewritten, which won't happen until after the IR1
- interpreter is gone, the system's notion of what's a top-level form
- and what's not will remain too confused to fix this problem.]
-
145:
+ a.
ANSI allows types `(COMPLEX ,FOO) to use very hairy values for
FOO, e.g. (COMPLEX (AND REAL (SATISFIES ODDP))). The old CMU CL
COMPLEX implementation didn't deal with this, and hasn't been
conformance problem, since seems hard to construct useful code
where it matters.)
+ b. (fixed in 0.8.3.43)
+
146:
Floating point errors are reported poorly. E.g. on x86 OpenBSD
with sbcl-0.7.1,
It should be possible to be much more specific (overflow, division
by zero, etc.) and of course the "How can this be?" should be fixable.
-148:
- In sbcl-0.7.1.3 on x86, COMPILE-FILE on the file
- (in-package :cl-user)
- (defvar *thing*)
- (defvar *zoom*)
- (defstruct foo bar bletch)
- (defun %zeep ()
- (labels ((kidify1 (kid)
- )
- (kid-frob (kid)
- (if *thing*
- (setf sweptm
- (m+ (frobnicate kid)
- sweptm))
- (kidify1 kid))))
- (declare (inline kid-frob))
- (map nil
- #'kid-frob
- (the simple-vector (foo-bar perd)))))
- fails with
- debugger invoked on condition of type TYPE-ERROR:
- The value NIL is not of type SB-C::NODE.
- The location of this failure has moved around as various related
- issues were cleaned up. As of sbcl-0.7.1.9, it occurs in
- NODE-BLOCK called by LAMBDA-COMPONENT called by IR2-CONVERT-CLOSURE.
-
-153:
- (essentially the same problem as a CMU CL bug reported by Martin
- Cracauer on cmucl-imp 2002-02-19)
- There is a hole in structure slot type checking. Compiling and LOADing
- (declaim (optimize safety))
- (defstruct foo
- (bla 0 :type fixnum))
- (defun f ()
- (let ((foo (make-foo)))
- (setf (foo-bla foo) '(1 . 1))
- (format t "Is ~a of type ~a a cons? => ~a~%"
- (foo-bla foo)
- (type-of (foo-bla foo))
- (consp (foo-bla foo)))))
- (f)
- should signal an error, but in sbcl-0.7.1.21 instead gives the output
- Is (1 . 1) of type CONS a cons? => NIL
- without signalling an error.
-
-154:
- There's some sort of problem with aborting back out of the debugger
- after a %DETECT-STACK-EXHAUSTION error in sbcl-0.7.1.38. In some cases
- telling the debugger to ABORT doesn't get you back to the main REPL,
- but instead just gives you another stack exhaustion error. The problem
- doesn't occur in the trivial case
- * (defun frob () (frob) (frob))
- FROB
- * (frob)
- but it has happened in more complicated cases (which I haven't
- figured out how to reproduce).
-
-156:
- FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION doesn't work right in 0.7.0 or 0.7.2.9:
- * (function-lambda-expression #'(lambda (x) x))
- debugger invoked on condition of type TYPE-ERROR:
- The value NIL is not of type SB-C::DEBUG-SOURCE
- (reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-04-12)
-
-157:
- Functions SUBTYPEP, TYPEP, UPGRADED-ARRAY-ELEMENT-TYPE, and
- UPGRADED-COMPLEX-PART-TYPE should have an optional environment argument.
- (reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-04-12)
+ See also bugs #45.c and #183
162:
(reported by Robert E. Brown 2002-04-16)
isn't too surprising since there are many differences in stack
implementation and GC conservatism between the X86 and other ports.)
-165:
- Array types with element-types of some unknown type are falsely being
- assumed to be of type (ARRAY T) by the compiler in some cases. The
- following code demonstrates the problem:
-
- (defun foo (x)
- (declare (type (vector bar) x))
- (aref x 1))
- (deftype bar () 'single-float)
- (foo (make-array 3 :element-type 'bar))
- -> TYPE-ERROR "The value #(0.0 0.0 0.0) is not of type (VECTOR BAR)."
- (typep (make-array 3 :element-type 'bar) '(vector bar))
- -> T
-
- The easy solution is to make the functions which depend on knowing
- the upgraded-array-element-type (in compiler/array-tran and
- compiler/generic/vm-tran as of sbcl-0.7.3.x) be slightly smarter about
- unknown types; an alternative is to have the
- specialized-element-type slot in the ARRAY-TYPE structure be
- *WILD-TYPE* for UNKNOWN-TYPE element types.
-
-166:
- Compiling
- (in-package :cl-user)
- (defstruct uustk)
- (defmethod permanentize ((uustk uustk))
- (flet ((frob (hash-table test-for-deletion)
- )
- (obj-entry.stale? (oe)
- (destructuring-bind (key . datum) oe
- (declare (type simple-vector key))
- (deny0 (void? datum))
- (some #'stale? key))))
- (declare (inline frob obj-entry.stale?))
- (frob (uustk.args-hash->obj-alist uustk)
- #'obj-entry.stale?)
- (frob (uustk.hash->memoized-objs-list uustk)
- #'objs.stale?))
- (call-next-method))
- in sbcl-0.7.3.11 causes an assertion failure,
- failed AVER:
- "(NOT
-(AND (NULL (BLOCK-SUCC B))
- (NOT (BLOCK-DELETE-P B))
- (NOT (EQ B (COMPONENT-HEAD #)))))"
-
-167:
- In sbcl-0.7.3.11, compiling the (illegal) code
- (in-package :cl-user)
- (defmethod prove ((uustk uustk))
- (zap ((frob () nil))
- (frob)))
- gives the (not terribly clear) error message
- ; caught ERROR:
- ; (during macroexpansion of (DEFMETHOD PROVE ...))
- ; can't get template for (FROB NIL NIL)
- The problem seems to be that the code walker used by the DEFMETHOD
- macro is unhappy with the illegal syntax in the method body, and
- is giving an unclear error message.
-
-168:
- (reported by Dan Barlow on sbcl-devel 2002-05-10)
- In sbcl-0.7.3.12, doing
- (defstruct foo bar baz)
- (compile nil (lambda (x) (or x (foo-baz x))))
- gives an error
- debugger invoked on condition of type SB-INT:BUG:
- full call to SB-KERNEL:%INSTANCE-REF
- This is probably a bug in SBCL itself. [...]
- Since this is a reasonable user error, it shouldn't be reported as
- an SBCL bug.
-
-171:
- (reported by Pierre Mai while investigating bug 47):
- (DEFCLASS FOO () ((A :SILLY T)))
- signals a SIMPLE-ERROR, not a PROGRAM-ERROR.
-
-172:
- sbcl's treatment of at least macro lambda lists is too permissive;
- e.g., in sbcl-0.7.3.7:
- (defmacro foo (&rest rest bar) `(,bar ,rest))
- (macroexpand '(foo quux zot)) -> (QUUX (QUUX ZOT))
- whereas section 3.4.4 of the CLHS doesn't allow required parameters
- to come after the rest argument.
+ This is probably the same bug as 216
173:
The compiler sometimes tries to constant-fold expressions before
code. Since then the warning has been downgraded to STYLE-WARNING,
so it's still a bug but at least it's a little less annoying.
-174:
- The error message from attempting to use a #\Return format
- directive:
- (format nil "~^M") ; replace "^M" with a literal #\Return
- debugger invoked on condition of type SB-FORMAT::FORMAT-ERROR:
- error in format: unknown format directive
- ~
- ^
- is not terribly helpful; this is more noticeable than parallel cases
- with e.g. #\Backspace because of the differing newline conventions
- on various operating systems. (reported by Harald Hanche-Olsen on
- cmucl-help 2002-05-31)
-
-176:
- reported by Alexey Dejneka 08 Jun 2002 in sbcl-devel:
- Playing with McCLIM, I've received an error "Unbound variable WRAPPER
- in SB-PCL::CHECK-WRAPPER-VALIDITY".
- (defun check-wrapper-validity (instance)
- (let* ((owrapper (wrapper-of instance)))
- (if (not (invalid-wrapper-p owrapper))
- owrapper
- (let* ((state (wrapper-state wrapper)) ; !!!
- ...
- I've tried to replace it with OWRAPPER, but now OBSOLETE-INSTANCE-TRAP
- breaks with "NIL is not of type SB-KERNEL:LAYOUT".
- SBCL 0.7.4.13.
- partial fix: The undefined variable WRAPPER resulted from an error
- in recent refactoring, as can be seen by comparing to the code in e.g.
- sbcl-0.7.2. Replacing WRAPPER with OWRAPPER (done by WHN in sbcl-0.7.4.22)
- should bring the code back to its behavior as of sbcl-0.7.2, but
- that still leaves the OBSOLETE-INSTANCE-TRAP bug. An example of
- input which triggers that bug is
- (dotimes (i 20)
- (let ((lastname (intern (format nil "C~D" (1- i))))
- (name (intern (format nil "C~D" i))))
- (eval `(defclass ,name
- (,@(if (= i 0) nil (list lastname)))
- ()))
- (eval `(defmethod initialize-instance :after ((x ,name) &rest any)
- (declare (ignore any))))))
- (defclass b () ())
- (defclass c0 (b) ())
- (make-instance 'c19)
-
-177:
- reported by Stig E Sandoe 8 Jun 2002 on sbcl-devel:
- ;;; I am a bit unsure about SBCL's warnings with some of my code.
- ;;; ASDF seems to die on warnings and SBCL seems to generate one
- ;;; out of nothing. I've tried to turn it into an example
- ;;; (that can be LOADed or COMPILEd to reproduce warnings):
- (in-package :cl-user)
- (defclass a () ())
- (defclass b () ())
- (defclass c (b) ())
- (defgeneric get-price (obj1 obj2))
- (defmethod get-price (obj1 obj2)
- 0)
- (defmethod get-price ((obj1 a) (obj2 b))
- 20)
- (defmethod get-price ((obj1 a) (obj2 c))
- (* 3 (call-next-method)))
- (print (get-price (make-instance 'a) (make-instance 'c)))
- ;;; In the GET-PRICE where I call CALL-NEXT-METHOD, it starts to
- ;;; generate real WARNINGS:
- ;;; stig@palomba(9:02)[~] 690> sbcl
- ;;; This is SBCL 0.7.4, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
- ;;; ...
- ;;; * (load "call-next")
- ;;; ; in: LAMBDA NIL
- ;;; ; (CALL-NEXT-METHOD)
- ;;; ; --> SB-PCL::CALL-NEXT-METHOD-BODY IF IF
- ;;; ; --> SB-PCL::INVOKE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD-FUNCTION LOCALLY COND IF COND IF
- ;;; PROGN
- ;;; ; --> LET WHEN COND IF PROGN SETF LET* MULTIPLE-VALUE-BIND LET FUNCALL
- ;;; ; --> SB-C::%FUNCALL BLOCK SETF SB-KERNEL:%SVSET SB-KERNEL:%ASET LET*
- ;;; ; --> SB-KERNEL:HAIRY-DATA-VECTOR-SET MULTIPLE-VALUE-BIND
- ;;; MULTIPLE-VALUE-CALL
- ;;; ; --> FUNCTION
- ;;; ; ==>
- ;;; ; (SB-KERNEL:DATA-VECTOR-SET (TRULY-THE (SIMPLE-ARRAY T 1) ARRAY)
- ;;; ; SB-INT:INDEX
- ;;; ; SB-C::NEW-VALUE)
- ;;; ;
- ;;; ; caught WARNING:
- ;;; ; Result is a A, not a NUMBER.
- ;;; ...
- ;;; ; compilation unit finished
- ;;; ; caught 4 WARNING conditions
-
-
-DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS
- IR1-#:
- These labels were used for bugs related to the old IR1 interpreter.
- The # values reached 6 before the category was closed down.
+183: "IEEE floating point issues"
+ Even where floating point handling is being dealt with relatively
+ well (as of sbcl-0.7.5, on sparc/sunos and alpha; see bug #146), the
+ accrued-exceptions and current-exceptions part of the fp control
+ word don't seem to bear much relation to reality. E.g. on
+ SPARC/SunOS:
+ * (/ 1.0 0.0)
+
+ debugger invoked on condition of type DIVISION-BY-ZERO:
+ arithmetic error DIVISION-BY-ZERO signalled
+ 0] (sb-vm::get-floating-point-modes)
+
+ (:TRAPS (:OVERFLOW :INVALID :DIVIDE-BY-ZERO)
+ :ROUNDING-MODE :NEAREST
+ :CURRENT-EXCEPTIONS NIL
+ :ACCRUED-EXCEPTIONS (:INEXACT)
+ :FAST-MODE NIL)
+ 0] abort
+ * (sb-vm::get-floating-point-modes)
+ (:TRAPS (:OVERFLOW :INVALID :DIVIDE-BY-ZERO)
+ :ROUNDING-MODE :NEAREST
+ :CURRENT-EXCEPTIONS (:INEXACT)
+ :ACCRUED-EXCEPTIONS (:INEXACT)
+ :FAST-MODE NIL)
+
+188: "compiler performance fiasco involving type inference and UNION-TYPE"
+ (time (compile
+ nil
+ '(lambda ()
+ (declare (optimize (safety 3)))
+ (declare (optimize (compilation-speed 2)))
+ (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 1) (space 1)))
+ (let ((start 4))
+ (declare (type (integer 0) start))
+ (print (incf start 22))
+ (print (incf start 26))
+ (print (incf start 28)))
+ (let ((start 6))
+ (declare (type (integer 0) start))
+ (print (incf start 22))
+ (print (incf start 26)))
+ (let ((start 10))
+ (declare (type (integer 0) start))
+ (print (incf start 22))
+ (print (incf start 26))))))
+
+ This example could be solved with clever enough constraint
+ propagation or with SSA, but consider
+
+ (let ((x 0))
+ (loop (incf x 2)))
+
+ The careful type of X is {2k} :-(. Is it really important to be
+ able to work with unions of many intervals?
+
+191: "Miscellaneous PCL deficiencies"
+ (reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-08-04)
+ a. DEFCLASS does not inform the compiler about generated
+ functions. Compiling a file with
+ (DEFCLASS A-CLASS ()
+ ((A-CLASS-X)))
+ (DEFUN A-CLASS-X (A)
+ (WITH-SLOTS (A-CLASS-X) A
+ A-CLASS-X))
+ results in a STYLE-WARNING:
+ undefined-function
+ SB-SLOT-ACCESSOR-NAME::|COMMON-LISP-USER A-CLASS-X slot READER|
+
+ APD's fix for this was checked in to sbcl-0.7.6.20, but Pierre
+ Mai points out that the declamation of functions is in fact
+ incorrect in some cases (most notably for structure
+ classes). This means that at present erroneous attempts to use
+ WITH-SLOTS and the like on classes with metaclass STRUCTURE-CLASS
+ won't get the corresponding STYLE-WARNING.
+ c. (fixed in 0.8.4.23)
+
+201: "Incautious type inference from compound types"
+ a. (reported by APD sbcl-devel 2002-09-17)
+ (DEFUN FOO (X)
+ (LET ((Y (CAR (THE (CONS INTEGER *) X))))
+ (SETF (CAR X) NIL)
+ (FORMAT NIL "~S IS ~S, Y = ~S"
+ (CAR X)
+ (TYPECASE (CAR X)
+ (INTEGER 'INTEGER)
+ (T '(NOT INTEGER)))
+ Y)))
+
+ (FOO ' (1 . 2)) => "NIL IS INTEGER, Y = 1"
+
+ b.
+ * (defun foo (x)
+ (declare (type (array * (4 4)) x))
+ (let ((y x))
+ (setq x (make-array '(4 4)))
+ (adjust-array y '(3 5))
+ (= (array-dimension y 0) (eval `(array-dimension ,y 0)))))
+ FOO
+ * (foo (make-array '(4 4) :adjustable t))
+ NIL
+
+205: "environment issues in cross compiler"
+ (These bugs have no impact on user code, but should be fixed or
+ documented.)
+ a. Macroexpanders introduced with MACROLET are defined in the null
+ lexical environment.
+ b. The body of (EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL) ...) is evaluated in
+ the null lexical environment.
+ c. The cross-compiler cannot inline functions defined in a non-null
+ lexical environment.
+
+206: ":SB-FLUID feature broken"
+ (reported by Antonio Martinez-Shotton sbcl-devel 2002-10-07)
+ Enabling :SB-FLUID in the target-features list in sbcl-0.7.8 breaks
+ the build.
+
+207: "poorly distributed SXHASH results for compound data"
+ SBCL's SXHASH could probably try a little harder. ANSI: "the
+ intent is that an implementation should make a good-faith
+ effort to produce hash-codes that are well distributed
+ within the range of non-negative fixnums". But
+ (let ((hits (make-hash-table)))
+ (dotimes (i 16)
+ (dotimes (j 16)
+ (let* ((ij (cons i j))
+ (newlist (push ij (gethash (sxhash ij) hits))))
+ (when (cdr newlist)
+ (format t "~&collision: ~S~%" newlist))))))
+ reports lots of collisions in sbcl-0.7.8. A stronger MIX function
+ would be an obvious way of fix. Maybe it would be acceptably efficient
+ to redo MIX using a lookup into a 256-entry s-box containing
+ 29-bit pseudorandom numbers?
+
+211: "keywords processing"
+ a. :ALLOW-OTHER-KEYS T should allow a function to receive an odd
+ number of keyword arguments.
+ e. Compiling
+
+ (flet ((foo (&key y) (list y)))
+ (list (foo :y 1 :y 2)))
+
+ issues confusing message
+
+ ; in: LAMBDA NIL
+ ; (FOO :Y 1 :Y 2)
+ ;
+ ; caught STYLE-WARNING:
+ ; The variable #:G15 is defined but never used.
+
+212: "Sequence functions and circular arguments"
+ COERCE, MERGE and CONCATENATE go into an infinite loop when given
+ circular arguments; it would be good for the user if they could be
+ given an error instead (ANSI 17.1.1 allows this behaviour on the part
+ of the implementation, as conforming code cannot give non-proper
+ sequences to these functions. MAP also has this problem (and
+ solution), though arguably the convenience of being able to do
+ (MAP 'LIST '+ FOO '#1=(1 . #1#))
+ might be classed as more important (though signalling an error when
+ all of the arguments are circular is probably desireable).
+
+213: "Sequence functions and type checking"
+ b. MAP, when given a type argument that is SUBTYPEP LIST, does not
+ check that it will return a sequence of the given type. Fixing
+ it along the same lines as the others (cf. work done around
+ sbcl-0.7.8.45) is possible, but doing so efficiently didn't look
+ entirely straightforward.
+ c. All of these functions will silently accept a type of the form
+ (CONS INTEGER *)
+ whether or not the return value is of this type. This is
+ probably permitted by ANSI (see "Exceptional Situations" under
+ ANSI MAKE-SEQUENCE), but the DERIVE-TYPE mechanism does not
+ know about this escape clause, so code of the form
+ (INTEGERP (CAR (MAKE-SEQUENCE '(CONS INTEGER *) 2)))
+ can erroneously return T.
+
+215: ":TEST-NOT handling by functions"
+ a. FIND and POSITION currently signal errors when given non-NIL for
+ both their :TEST and (deprecated) :TEST-NOT arguments, but by
+ ANSI 17.2 "the consequences are unspecified", which by ANSI 1.4.2
+ means that the effect is "unpredictable but harmless". It's not
+ clear what that actually means; it may preclude conforming
+ implementations from signalling errors.
+ b. COUNT, REMOVE and the like give priority to a :TEST-NOT argument
+ when conflict occurs. As a quality of implementation issue, it
+ might be preferable to treat :TEST and :TEST-NOT as being in some
+ sense the same &KEY, and effectively take the first test function in
+ the argument list.
+ c. Again, a quality of implementation issue: it would be good to issue a
+ STYLE-WARNING at compile-time for calls with :TEST-NOT, and a
+ WARNING for calls with both :TEST and :TEST-NOT; possibly this
+ latter should be WARNed about at execute-time too.
+
+216: "debugger confused by frames with invalid number of arguments"
+ In sbcl-0.7.8.51, executing e.g. (VECTOR-PUSH-EXTEND T), BACKTRACE, Q
+ leaves the system confused, enough so that (QUIT) no longer works.
+ It's as though the process of working with the uninitialized slot in
+ the bad VECTOR-PUSH-EXTEND frame causes GC problems, though that may
+ not be the actual problem. (CMU CL 18c doesn't have problems with this.)
+
+ This is probably the same bug as 162
+
+217: "Bad type operations with FUNCTION types"
+ In sbcl.0.7.7:
+
+ * (values-type-union (specifier-type '(function (base-char)))
+ (specifier-type '(function (integer))))
+
+ #<FUN-TYPE (FUNCTION (BASE-CHAR) *)>
+
+ It causes insertion of wrong type assertions into generated
+ code. E.g.
+
+ (defun foo (x s)
+ (let ((f (etypecase x
+ (character #'write-char)
+ (integer #'write-byte))))
+ (funcall f x s)
+ (etypecase x
+ (character (write-char x s))
+ (integer (write-byte x s)))))
+
+ Then (FOO #\1 *STANDARD-OUTPUT*) signals type error.
+
+ (In 0.7.9.1 the result type is (FUNCTION * *), so Python does not
+ produce invalid code, but type checking is not accurate.)
+
+233: bugs in constraint propagation
+ b.
+ (declaim (optimize (speed 2) (safety 3)))
+ (defun foo (x y)
+ (if (typep (prog1 x (setq x y)) 'double-float)
+ (+ x 1d0)
+ (+ x 2)))
+ (foo 1d0 5) => segmentation violation
+
+235: "type system and inline expansion"
+ a.
+ (declaim (ftype (function (cons) number) acc))
+ (declaim (inline acc))
+ (defun acc (c)
+ (the number (car c)))
+
+ (defun foo (x y)
+ (values (locally (declare (optimize (safety 0)))
+ (acc x))
+ (locally (declare (optimize (safety 3)))
+ (acc y))))
+
+ (foo '(nil) '(t)) => NIL, T.
+
+237: "Environment arguments to type functions"
+ a. Functions SUBTYPEP, TYPEP, UPGRADED-ARRAY-ELEMENT-TYPE, and
+ UPGRADED-COMPLEX-PART-TYPE now have an optional environment
+ argument, but they ignore it completely. This is almost
+ certainly not correct.
+ b. Also, the compiler's optimizers for TYPEP have not been informed
+ about the new argument; consequently, they will not transform
+ calls of the form (TYPEP 1 'INTEGER NIL), even though this is
+ just as optimizeable as (TYPEP 1 'INTEGER).
+
+238: "REPL compiler overenthusiasm for CLOS code"
+ From the REPL,
+ * (defclass foo () ())
+ * (defmethod bar ((x foo) (foo foo)) (call-next-method))
+ causes approximately 100 lines of code deletion notes. Some
+ discussion on this issue happened under the title 'Three "interesting"
+ bugs in PCL', resulting in a fix for this oververbosity from the
+ compiler proper; however, the problem persists in the interactor
+ because the notion of original source is not preserved: for the
+ compiler, the original source of the above expression is (DEFMETHOD
+ BAR ((X FOO) (FOO FOO)) (CALL-NEXT-METHOD)), while by the time the
+ compiler gets its hands on the code needing compilation from the REPL,
+ it has been macroexpanded several times.
+
+ A symptom of the same underlying problem, reported by Tony Martinez:
+ * (handler-case
+ (with-input-from-string (*query-io* " no")
+ (yes-or-no-p))
+ (simple-type-error () 'error))
+ ; in: LAMBDA NIL
+ ; (SB-KERNEL:FLOAT-WAIT)
+ ;
+ ; note: deleting unreachable code
+ ; compilation unit finished
+ ; printed 1 note
+
+242: "WRITE-SEQUENCE suboptimality"
+ (observed from clx performance)
+ In sbcl-0.7.13, WRITE-SEQUENCE of a sequence of type
+ (SIMPLE-ARRAY (UNSIGNED-BYTE 8) (*)) on a stream with element-type
+ (UNSIGNED-BYTE 8) will write to the stream one byte at a time,
+ rather than writing the sequence in one go, leading to severe
+ performance degradation.
+
+243: "STYLE-WARNING overenthusiasm for unused variables"
+ (observed from clx compilation)
+ In sbcl-0.7.14, in the presence of the macros
+ (DEFMACRO FOO (X) `(BAR ,X))
+ (DEFMACRO BAR (X) (DECLARE (IGNORABLE X)) 'NIL)
+ somewhat surprising style warnings are emitted for
+ (COMPILE NIL '(LAMBDA (Y) (FOO Y))):
+ ; in: LAMBDA (Y)
+ ; (LAMBDA (Y) (FOO Y))
+ ;
+ ; caught STYLE-WARNING:
+ ; The variable Y is defined but never used.
+
+245: bugs in disassembler
+ b. On X86 operand size prefix is not recognized.
+
+251:
+ (defun foo (&key (a :x))
+ (declare (fixnum a))
+ a)
+
+ does not cause a warning. (BTW: old SBCL issued a warning, but for a
+ function, which was never called!)
+
+256:
+ Compiler does not emit warnings for
+
+ a. (lambda () (svref (make-array 8 :adjustable t) 1))
+
+ b. (lambda (x)
+ (list (let ((y (the real x)))
+ (unless (floatp y) (error ""))
+ y)
+ (integer-length x)))
+
+ c. (lambda (x)
+ (declare (optimize (debug 0)))
+ (declare (type vector x))
+ (list (fill-pointer x)
+ (svref x 1)))
+
+257:
+ Complex array type does not have corresponding type specifier.
+
+ This is a problem because the compiler emits optimization notes when
+ you use a non-simple array, and without a type specifier for hairy
+ array types, there's no good way to tell it you're doing it
+ intentionally so that it should shut up and just compile the code.
+
+ Another problem is confusing error message "asserted type ARRAY
+ conflicts with derived type (VALUES SIMPLE-VECTOR &OPTIONAL)" during
+ compiling (LAMBDA (V) (VALUES (SVREF V 0) (VECTOR-POP V))).
+
+ The last problem is that when type assertions are converted to type
+ checks, types are represented with type specifiers, so we could lose
+ complex attribute. (Now this is probably not important, because
+ currently checks for complex arrays seem to be performed by
+ callees.)
+
+259:
+ (compile nil '(lambda () (aref (make-array 0) 0))) compiles without
+ warning. Analogous cases with the index and length being equal and
+ greater than 0 are warned for; the problem here seems to be that the
+ type required for an array reference of this type is (INTEGER 0 (0))
+ which is canonicalized to NIL.
+
+260:
+ a.
+ (let* ((s (gensym))
+ (t1 (specifier-type s)))
+ (eval `(defstruct ,s))
+ (type= t1 (specifier-type s)))
+ => NIL, NIL
+
+ (fixed in 0.8.1.24)
+
+ b. The same for CSUBTYPEP.
+
+262: "yet another bug in inline expansion of local functions"
+ Compiler fails on
+
+ (defun foo (x y)
+ (declare (integer x y))
+ (+ (block nil
+ (flet ((xyz (u)
+ (declare (integer u))
+ (if (> (1+ (the unsigned-byte u)) 0)
+ (+ 1 u)
+ (return (+ 38 (cos (/ u 78)))))))
+ (declare (inline xyz))
+ (return-from foo
+ (* (funcall (eval #'xyz) x)
+ (if (> x 30)
+ (funcall (if (> x 5) #'xyz #'identity)
+ (+ x 13))
+ 38)))))
+ (sin (* x y))))
+
+ Urgh... It's time to write IR1-copier.
+
+266:
+ David Lichteblau provided (sbcl-devel 2003-06-01) a patch to fix
+ behaviour of streams with element-type (SIGNED-BYTE 8). The patch
+ looks reasonable, if not obviously correct; however, it caused the
+ PPC/Linux port to segfault during warm-init while loading
+ src/pcl/std-class.fasl. A workaround patch was made, but it would
+ be nice to understand why the first patch caused problems, and to
+ fix the cause if possible.
+
+268: "wrong free declaration scope"
+ The following code must signal type error:
+
+ (locally (declare (optimize (safety 3)))
+ (flet ((foo (x &optional (y (car x)))
+ (declare (optimize (safety 0)))
+ (list x y)))
+ (funcall (eval #'foo) 1)))
+
+270:
+ In the following function constraint propagator optimizes nothing:
+
+ (defun foo (x)
+ (declare (integer x))
+ (declare (optimize speed))
+ (typecase x
+ (fixnum "hala")
+ (fixnum "buba")
+ (bignum "hip")
+ (t "zuz")))
+
+273:
+ Compilation of the following two forms causes "X is unbound" error:
+
+ (symbol-macrolet ((x pi))
+ (macrolet ((foo (y) (+ x y)))
+ (declaim (inline bar))
+ (defun bar (z)
+ (* z (foo 4)))))
+ (defun quux (z)
+ (bar z))
+
+ (See (COERCE (CDR X) 'FUNCTION) in IR1-CONVERT-INLINE-LAMBDA.)
+
+274:
+ CLHS says that type declaration of a symbol macro should not affect
+ its expansion, but in SBCL it does. (If you like magic and want to
+ fix it, don't forget to change all uses of MACROEXPAND to
+ MACROEXPAND*.)
+
+275:
+ The following code (taken from CLOCC) takes a lot of time to compile:
+
+ (defun foo (n)
+ (declare (type (integer 0 #.large-constant) n))
+ (expt 1/10 n))
+
+ (fixed in 0.8.2.51, but a test case would be good)
+
+278:
+ a.
+ (defun foo ()
+ (declare (optimize speed))
+ (loop for i of-type (integer 0) from 0 by 2 below 10
+ collect i))
+
+ uses generic arithmetic.
+
+ b. (fixed in 0.8.3.6)
+
+279: type propagation error -- correctly inferred type goes astray?
+ In sbcl-0.8.3 and sbcl-0.8.1.47, the warning
+ The binding of ABS-FOO is a (VALUES (INTEGER 0 0)
+ &OPTIONAL), not a (INTEGER 1 536870911)
+ is emitted when compiling this file:
+ (declaim (ftype (function ((integer 0 #.most-positive-fixnum))
+ (integer #.most-negative-fixnum 0))
+ foo))
+ (defun foo (x)
+ (- x))
+ (defun bar (x)
+ (let* (;; Uncomment this for a type mismatch warning indicating
+ ;; that the type of (FOO X) is correctly understood.
+ #+nil (fs-foo (float-sign (foo x)))
+ ;; Uncomment this for a type mismatch warning
+ ;; indicating that the type of (ABS (FOO X)) is
+ ;; correctly understood.
+ #+nil (fs-abs-foo (float-sign (abs (foo x))))
+ ;; something wrong with this one though
+ (abs-foo (abs (foo x))))
+ (declare (type (integer 1 100) abs-foo))
+ (print abs-foo)))
+
+ (see also bug 117)
+
+281: COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD error signalling.
+ (slightly obscured by a non-0 default value for
+ SB-PCL::*MAX-EMF-PRECOMPUTE-METHODS*)
+ It would be natural for COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD to signal errors
+ when it finds a method with invalid qualifiers. However, it
+ shouldn't signal errors when any such methods are not applicable to
+ the particular call being evaluated, and certainly it shouldn't when
+ simply precomputing effective methods that may never be called.
+ (setf sb-pcl::*max-emf-precompute-methods* 0)
+ (defgeneric foo (x)
+ (:method-combination +)
+ (:method ((x symbol)) 1)
+ (:method + ((x number)) x))
+ (foo 1) -> ERROR, but should simply return 1
+
+ The issue seems to be that construction of a discriminating function
+ calls COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD with methods that are not all applicable.
+
+283: Thread safety: libc functions
+ There are places that we call unsafe-for-threading libc functions
+ that we should find alternatives for, or put locks around. Known or
+ strongly suspected problems, as of 0.8.3.10: please update this
+ bug instead of creating new ones
+
+ localtime() - called for timezone calculations in code/time.lisp
+
+284: Thread safety: special variables
+ There are lots of special variables in SBCL, and I feel sure that at
+ least some of them are indicative of potentially thread-unsafe
+ parts of the system. See doc/internals/notes/threading-specials
+
+286: "recursive known functions"
+ Self-call recognition conflicts with known function
+ recognition. Currently cross compiler and target COMPILE do not
+ recognize recursion, and in target compiler it can be disabled. We
+ can always disable it for known functions with RECURSIVE attribute,
+ but there remains a possibility of a function with a
+ (tail)-recursive simplification pass and transforms/VOPs for base
+ cases.
+
+287: PPC/Linux miscompilation or corruption in first GC
+ When the runtime is compiled with -O3 on certain PPC/Linux machines, a
+ segmentation fault is reported at the point of first triggered GC,
+ during the compilation of DEFSTRUCT WRAPPER. As a temporary workaround,
+ the runtime is no longer compiled with -O3 on PPC/Linux, but it is likely
+ that this merely obscures, not solves, the underlying problem; as and when
+ underlying problems are fixed, it would be worth trying again to provoke
+ this problem.
+
+288: fundamental cross-compilation issues (from old UGLINESS file)
+ Using host floating point numbers to represent target floating point
+ numbers, or host characters to represent target characters, is
+ theoretically shaky. (The characters are OK as long as the characters
+ are in the ANSI-guaranteed character set, though, so they aren't a
+ real problem as long as the sources don't need anything but that;
+ the floats are a real problem.)
+
+289: "type checking and source-transforms"
+ a.
+ (block nil (let () (funcall #'+ (eval 'nil) (eval '1) (return :good))))
+ signals type error.
+
+ Our policy is to check argument types at the moment of a call. It
+ disagrees with ANSI, which says that type assertions are put
+ immediately onto argument expressions, but is easier to implement in
+ IR1 and is more compatible to type inference, inline expansion,
+ etc. IR1-transforms automatically keep this policy, but source
+ transforms for associative functions (such as +), being applied
+ during IR1-convertion, do not. It may be tolerable for direct calls
+ (+ x y z), but for (FUNCALL #'+ x y z) it is non-conformant.
+
+ b. Another aspect of this problem is efficiency. [x y + z +]
+ requires less registers than [x y z + +]. This transformation is
+ currently performed with source transforms, but it would be good to
+ also perform it in IR1 optimization phase.
+
+290: Alpha floating point and denormalized traps
+ In SBCL 0.8.3.6x on the alpha, we work around what appears to be a
+ hardware or kernel deficiency: the status of the enable/disable
+ denormalized-float traps bit seems to be ambiguous; by the time we
+ get to os_restore_fp_control after a trap, denormalized traps seem
+ to be enabled. Since we don't want a trap every time someone uses a
+ denormalized float, in general, we mask out that bit when we restore
+ the control word; however, this clobbers any change the user might
+ have made.
+
+296:
+ (reported by Adam Warner, sbcl-devel 2003-09-23)
+
+ The --load toplevel argument does not perform any sanitization of its
+ argument. As a result, files with Lisp pathname pattern characters
+ (#\* or #\?, for instance) or quotation marks can cause the system
+ to perform arbitrary behaviour.
+
+297:
+ LOOP with non-constant arithmetic step clauses suffers from overzealous
+ type constraint: code of the form
+ (loop for d of-type double-float from 0d0 to 10d0 by x collect d)
+ compiles to a type restriction on X of (AND DOUBLE-FLOAT (REAL
+ (0))). However, an integral value of X should be legal, because
+ successive adds of integers to double-floats produces double-floats,
+ so none of the type restrictions in the code is violated.
+
+300: (reported by Peter Graves) Function PEEK-CHAR checks PEEK-TYPE
+ argument type only after having read a character. This is caused
+ with EXPLICIT-CHECK attribute in DEFKNOWN. The similar problem
+ exists with =, /=, <, >, <=, >=. They were fixed, but it is probably
+ less error prone to have EXPLICIT-CHECK be a local declaration,
+ being put into the definition, instead of an attribute being kept in
+ a separate file; maybe also put it into SB-EXT?
+
+301: ARRAY-SIMPLE-=-TYPE-METHOD breaks on corner cases which can arise
+ in NOTE-ASSUMED-TYPES
+ In sbcl-0.8.7.32, compiling the file
+ (defun foo (x y)
+ (declare (type integer x))
+ (declare (type (vector (or hash-table bit)) y))
+ (bletch 2 y))
+ (defun bar (x y)
+ (declare (type integer x))
+ (declare (type (simple-array base (2)) y))
+ (bletch 1 y))
+ gives the error
+ failed AVER: "(NOT (AND (NOT EQUALP) CERTAINP))"
+
+302: Undefined type messes up DATA-VECTOR-REF expansion.
+ Compiling this file
+ (defun dis (s ei x y)
+ (declare (type (simple-array function (2)) s) (type ei ei))
+ (funcall (aref s ei) x y))
+ on sbcl-0.8.7.36/X86/Linux causes a BUG to be signalled:
+ full call to SB-KERNEL:DATA-VECTOR-REF
+
+303: "nonlinear LVARs" (aka MISC.293)
+ (defun buu (x)
+ (multiple-value-call #'list
+ (block foo
+ (multiple-value-prog1
+ (eval '(values :a :b :c))
+ (catch 'bar
+ (if (> x 0)
+ (return-from foo
+ (eval `(if (> ,x 1)
+ 1
+ (throw 'bar (values 3 4)))))))))))
+
+ (BUU 1) returns garbage.
+
+ The problem is that both EVALs sequentially write to the same LVAR.
+
+305:
+ (Reported by Dave Roberts.)
+ Local INLINE/NOTINLINE declaration removes local FTYPE declaration:
+
+ (defun quux (x)
+ (declare (ftype (function () (integer 0 10)) fee)
+ (inline fee))
+ (1+ (fee)))
+
+ uses generic arithmetic with INLINE and fixnum without.
+
+306: "Imprecise unions of array types"
+ a.(defun foo (x)
+ (declare (optimize speed)
+ (type (or (array cons) (array vector)) x))
+ (elt (aref x 0) 0))
+ (foo #((0))) => TYPE-ERROR
+
+ relatedly,
+
+ b.(subtypep
+ 'array
+ `(or
+ ,@(loop for x across sb-vm:*specialized-array-element-type-properties*
+ collect `(array ,(sb-vm:saetp-specifier x)))))
+ => NIL, T (when it should be T, T)
+
+308: "Characters without names"
+ (reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "character names are missing"
+ 2004-04-19)
+ (graphic-char-p (code-char 255))
+ => NIL
+ (char-name (code-char 255))
+ => NIL
+
+ SBCL is unsure of what to do about characters with codes in the
+ range 128-255. Currently they are treated as non-graphic, but don't
+ have names, which is not compliant with the standard. Various fixes
+ are possible, such as
+ * giving them names such as NON-ASCII-128;
+ * reducing CHAR-CODE-LIMIT to 127 (almost certainly unpopular);
+ * making the characters graphic (makes a certain amount of sense);
+ * biting the bullet and implementing Unicode (probably quite hard).
+
+309: "Dubious values for implementation limits"
+ (reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "Incorrect value of
+ multiple-values-limit" 2004-04-19)
+ (values-list (make-list 1000000)), on x86/linux, signals a stack
+ exhaustion condition, despite MULTIPLE-VALUES-LIMIT being
+ significantly larger than 1000000. There are probably similar
+ dubious values for CALL-ARGUMENTS-LIMIT (see cmucl-help/cmucl-imp
+ around the same time regarding a call to LIST on sparc with 1000
+ arguments) and other implementation limit constants.
+
+311: "Tokeniser not thread-safe"
+ (see also Robert Marlow sbcl-help "Multi threaded read chucking a
+ spak" 2004-04-19)
+ The tokenizer's use of *read-buffer* and *read-buffer-length* causes
+ spurious errors should two threads attempt to tokenise at the same
+ time.
+
+314: "LOOP :INITIALLY clauses and scope of initializers"
+ reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
+ test suite, originally by Thomas F. Burdick.
+ ;; <http://www.lisp.org/HyperSpec/Body/sec_6-1-7-2.html>
+ ;; According to the HyperSpec 6.1.2.1.4, in for-as-equals-then, var is
+ ;; initialized to the result of evaluating form1. 6.1.7.2 says that
+ ;; initially clauses are evaluated in the loop prologue, which precedes all
+ ;; loop code except for the initial settings provided by with, for, or as.
+ (loop :for x = 0 :then (1+ x)
+ :for y = (1+ x) :then (ash y 1)
+ :for z :across #(1 3 9 27 81 243)
+ :for w = (+ x y z)
+ :initially (assert (zerop x)) :initially (assert (= 2 w))
+ :until (>= w 100) :collect w)
+ Expected: (2 6 15 38)
+ Got: ERROR
+
+317: "FORMAT of floating point numbers"
+ reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
+ test suite.
+ (format nil "~1F" 10) => "0." ; "10." expected
+ (format nil "~0F" 10) => "0." ; "10." expected
+ (format nil "~2F" 1234567.1) => "1000000." ; "1234567." expected
+ it would be nice if whatever fixed this also untangled the two
+ competing implementations of floating point printing (Steele and
+ White, and Burger and Dybvig) present in src/code/print.lisp
+
+318: "stack overflow in compiler warning with redefined class"
+ reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
+ test suite.
+ (setq *print-pretty* nil)
+ (defstruct foo a)
+ (setf (find-class 'foo) nil)
+ (defstruct foo slot-1)
+ gives
+ ...#<SB-KERNEL:STRUCTURE-CLASSOID #<SB-KERNEL:STRUCTURE-CLASSOID #<SB-KERNEL:STRUCTURE-CLASSOID #<SB-KERNEL:STRUCTUREControl stack guard page temporarily disabled: proceed with caution
+ (it's not really clear what it should give: is (SETF FIND-CLASS)
+ meant to be enough to delete structure classes from the system?
+ Giving a stack overflow is definitely suboptimal, though.)
+
+319: "backquote with comma inside array"
+ reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
+ test suite.
+ (read-from-string "`#1A(1 2 ,(+ 2 2) 4)")
+ gives
+ #(1 2 ((SB-IMPL::|,|) + 2 2) 4)
+ which probably isn't intentional.
+
+323: "REPLACE, BIT-BASH and large strings"
+ The transform for REPLACE on simple-base-strings uses BIT-BASH, which
+ at present has an upper limit in size. Consequently, in sbcl-0.8.10
+ (defun foo ()
+ (declare (optimize speed (safety 1)))
+ (let ((x (make-string 140000000))
+ (y (make-string 140000000)))
+ (length (replace x y))))
+ (foo)
+ gives
+ debugger invoked on a TYPE-ERROR in thread 2412:
+ The value 1120000000 is not of type (MOD 536870911).
+ (see also "more and better sequence transforms" sbcl-devel 2004-05-10)
+
+324: "STREAMs and :ELEMENT-TYPE with large bytesize"
+ In theory, (open foo :element-type '(unsigned-byte <x>)) should work
+ for all positive integral <x>. At present, it only works for <x> up
+ to about 1024 (and similarly for signed-byte), so
+ (open "/dev/zero" :element-type '(unsigned-byte 1025))
+ gives an error in sbcl-0.8.10.
+
+325: "CLOSE :ABORT T on supeseding streams"
+ Closing a stream opened with :IF-EXISTS :SUPERSEDE with :ABORT T leaves no
+ file on disk, even if one existed before opening.
+
+ The illegality of this is not crystal clear, as the ANSI dictionary
+ entry for CLOSE says that when :ABORT is T superseded files are not
+ superseded (ie. the original should be restored), whereas the OPEN
+ entry says about :IF-EXISTS :SUPERSEDE "If possible, the
+ implementation should not destroy the old file until the new stream
+ is closed." -- implying that even though undesirable, early deletion
+ is legal. Restoring the original would none the less be the polite
+ thing to do.
+
+326: "*PRINT-CIRCLE* crosstalk between streams"
+ In sbcl-0.8.10.48 it's possible for *PRINT-CIRCLE* references to be
+ mixed between streams when output operations are intermingled closely
+ enough (as by doing output on S2 from within (PRINT-OBJECT X S1) in the
+ test case below), so that e.g. the references #2# appears on a stream
+ with no preceding #2= on that stream to define it (because the #2= was
+ sent to another stream).
+ (cl:in-package :cl-user)
+ (defstruct foo index)
+ (defparameter *foo* (make-foo :index 4))
+ (defstruct bar)
+ (defparameter *bar* (make-bar))
+ (defparameter *tangle* (list *foo* *bar* *foo*))
+ (defmethod print-object ((foo foo) stream)
+ (let ((index (foo-index foo)))
+ (format *trace-output*
+ "~&-$- emitting FOO ~D, ambient *BAR*=~S~%"
+ index *bar*)
+ (format stream "[FOO ~D]" index))
+ foo)
+ (let ((tsos (make-string-output-stream))
+ (ssos (make-string-output-stream)))
+ (let ((*print-circle* t)
+ (*trace-output* tsos)
+ (*standard-output* ssos))
+ (prin1 *tangle* *standard-output*))
+ (let ((string (get-output-stream-string ssos)))
+ (unless (string= string "(#1=[FOO 4] #S(BAR) #1#)")
+ ;; In sbcl-0.8.10.48 STRING was "(#1=[FOO 4] #2# #1#)".:-(
+ (error "oops: ~S" string)))))
+ It might be straightforward to fix this by turning the
+ *CIRCULARITY-HASH-TABLE* and *CIRCULARITY-COUNTER* variables into
+ per-stream slots, but (1) it would probably be sort of messy faking
+ up the special variable binding semantics using UNWIND-PROTECT and
+ (2) it might be sort of a pain to test that no other bugs had been
+ introduced.
+
+328: "Profiling generic functions", transplanted from #241
+ (from tonyms on #lisp IRC 2003-02-25)
+ In sbcl-0.7.12.55, typing
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :accessor foo-bar)))
+ (profile foo-bar)
+ (unintern 'foo-bar)
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :accessor foo-bar)))
+ gives the error message
+ "#:FOO-BAR already names an ordinary function or a macro."
+
+ Problem: when a generic function is profiled, it appears as an ordinary
+ function to PCL. (Remembering the uninterned accessor is OK, as the
+ redefinition must be able to remove old accessors from their generic
+ functions.)
+
+329: "Sequential class redefinition"
+ reported by Bruno Haible:
+ (defclass reactor () ((max-temp :initform 10000000)))
+ (defvar *r1* (make-instance 'reactor))
+ (defvar *r2* (make-instance 'reactor))
+ (slot-value *r1* 'max-temp)
+ (slot-value *r2* 'max-temp)
+ (defclass reactor () ((uptime :initform 0)))
+ (slot-value *r1* 'uptime)
+ (defclass reactor () ((uptime :initform 0) (max-temp :initform 10000)))
+ (slot-value *r1* 'max-temp) ; => 10000
+ (slot-value *r2* 'max-temp) ; => 10000000 oops...
+
+ Possible solution:
+ The method effective when the wrapper is obsoleted can be saved
+ in the wrapper, and then to update the instance just run through
+ all the old wrappers in order from oldest to newest.
+
+331: "lazy creation of CLOS classes for user-defined conditions"
+ (defstruct foo)
+ (defstruct (bar (:include foo)))
+ (sb-mop:class-direct-subclasses (find-class 'foo))
+ returns NIL, rather than a singleton list containing the BAR class.
+
+332: "fasl stack inconsistency in structure redefinition"
+ (reported by Tim Daly Jr sbcl-devel 2004-05-06)
+ Even though structure redefinition is undefined by the standard, the
+ following behaviour is suboptimal: running
+ (defun stimulate-sbcl ()
+ (let ((filename (format nil "/tmp/~A.lisp" (gensym))))
+ ;;create a file which redefines a structure incompatibly
+ (with-open-file (f filename :direction :output :if-exists :supersede)
+ (print '(defstruct astruct foo) f)
+ (print '(defstruct astruct foo bar) f))
+ ;;compile and load the file, then invoke the continue restart on
+ ;;the structure redefinition error
+ (handler-bind ((error (lambda (c) (continue c))))
+ (load (compile-file filename)))))
+ (stimulate-sbcl)
+ and choosing the CONTINUE restart yields the message
+ debugger invoked on a SB-INT:BUG in thread 27726:
+ fasl stack not empty when it should be
+
+336: "slot-definitions must retain the generic functions of accessors"
+ reported by Tony Martinez:
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :reader foo-bar)))
+ (defun foo-bar (x) x)
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :reader get-bar))) ; => error, should work
+
+ Note: just punting the accessor removal if the fdefinition
+ is not a generic function is not enough:
+
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :reader foo-bar)))
+ (defvar *reader* #'foo-bar)
+ (defun foo-bar (x) x)
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :initform 'ok :reader get-bar)))
+ (funcall *reader* (make-instance 'foo)) ; should be an error, since
+ ; the method must be removed
+ ; by the class redefinition
+
+ Fixing this should also fix a subset of #328 -- update the
+ description with a new test-case then.
+
+337: MAKE-METHOD and user-defined method classes
+ (reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel 2004-06-11)
+
+ In the presence of
+
+(defclass user-method (standard-method) (myslot))
+(defmacro def-user-method (name &rest rest)
+ (let* ((lambdalist-position (position-if #'listp rest))
+ (qualifiers (subseq rest 0 lambdalist-position))
+ (lambdalist (elt rest lambdalist-position))
+ (body (subseq rest (+ lambdalist-position 1)))
+ (required-part
+ (subseq lambdalist 0 (or
+ (position-if
+ (lambda (x) (member x lambda-list-keywords))
+ lambdalist)
+ (length lambdalist))))
+ (specializers (mapcar #'find-class
+ (mapcar (lambda (x) (if (consp x) (second x) t))
+ required-part)))
+ (unspecialized-required-part
+ (mapcar (lambda (x) (if (consp x) (first x) x)) required-part))
+ (unspecialized-lambdalist
+ (append unspecialized-required-part
+ (subseq lambdalist (length required-part)))))
+ `(PROGN
+ (ADD-METHOD #',name
+ (MAKE-INSTANCE 'USER-METHOD
+ :QUALIFIERS ',qualifiers
+ :LAMBDA-LIST ',unspecialized-lambdalist
+ :SPECIALIZERS ',specializers
+ :FUNCTION
+ (LAMBDA (ARGUMENTS NEXT-METHODS-LIST)
+ (FLET ((NEXT-METHOD-P () NEXT-METHODS-LIST)
+ (CALL-NEXT-METHOD (&REST NEW-ARGUMENTS)
+ (UNLESS NEW-ARGUMENTS (SETQ NEW-ARGUMENTS ARGUMENTS))
+ (IF (NULL NEXT-METHODS-LIST)
+ (ERROR "no next method for arguments ~:S" ARGUMENTS)
+ (FUNCALL (SB-PCL:METHOD-FUNCTION
+ (FIRST NEXT-METHODS-LIST))
+ NEW-ARGUMENTS (REST NEXT-METHODS-LIST)))))
+ (APPLY #'(LAMBDA ,unspecialized-lambdalist ,@body) ARGUMENTS)))))
+ ',name)))
+
+ (progn
+ (defgeneric test-um03 (x))
+ (defmethod test-um03 ((x integer))
+ (list* 'integer x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (def-user-method test-um03 ((x rational))
+ (list* 'rational x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um03 ((x real))
+ (list 'real x (not (null (next-method-p)))))
+ (test-um03 17))
+ works, but
+
+ a.(progn
+ (defgeneric test-um10 (x))
+ (defmethod test-um10 ((x integer))
+ (list* 'integer x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um10 ((x rational))
+ (list* 'rational x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um10 ((x real))
+ (list 'real x (not (null (next-method-p)))))
+ (defmethod test-um10 :after ((x real)))
+ (def-user-method test-um10 :around ((x integer))
+ (list* 'around-integer x
+ (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um10 :around ((x rational))
+ (list* 'around-rational x
+ (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um10 :around ((x real))
+ (list* 'around-real x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (test-um10 17))
+ fails with a type error, and
+
+ b.(progn
+ (defgeneric test-um12 (x))
+ (defmethod test-um12 ((x integer))
+ (list* 'integer x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um12 ((x rational))
+ (list* 'rational x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um12 ((x real))
+ (list 'real x (not (null (next-method-p)))))
+ (defmethod test-um12 :after ((x real)))
+ (defmethod test-um12 :around ((x integer))
+ (list* 'around-integer x
+ (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um12 :around ((x rational))
+ (list* 'around-rational x
+ (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (def-user-method test-um12 :around ((x real))
+ (list* 'around-real x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (test-um12 17))
+ fails with NO-APPLICABLE-METHOD.
+
+339: "DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION bugs"
+ (reported by Bruno Haible via the clisp test suite)
+
+ a. Syntax checking laxity (should produce errors):
+ i. (define-method-combination foo :documentation :operator)
+ ii. (define-method-combination foo :documentation nil)
+ iii. (define-method-combination foo nil)
+ iv. (define-method-combination foo nil nil
+ (:arguments order &aux &key))
+ v. (define-method-combination foo nil nil (:arguments &whole))
+ vi. (define-method-combination foo nil nil (:generic-function))
+ vii. (define-method-combination foo nil nil (:generic-function bar baz))
+ viii. (define-method-combination foo nil nil (:generic-function (bar)))
+ ix. (define-method-combination foo nil ((3)))
+ x. (define-method-combination foo nil ((a)))
+
+ b. define-method-combination arguments lambda list badness
+ i. &aux args are currently unsupported;
+ ii. default values of &optional and &key arguments are ignored;
+ iii. supplied-p variables for &optional and &key arguments are not
+ bound.
+
+ c. qualifier matching incorrect
+ (progn
+ (define-method-combination mc27 ()
+ ((normal ())
+ (ignored (:ignore :unused)))
+ `(list 'result
+ ,@(mapcar #'(lambda (method) `(call-method ,method)) normal)))
+ (defgeneric test-mc27 (x)
+ (:method-combination mc27)
+ (:method :ignore ((x number)) (/ 0)))
+ (test-mc27 7))
+
+ should signal an invalid-method-error, as the :IGNORE (NUMBER)
+ method is applicable, and yet matches neither of the method group
+ qualifier patterns.
+
+341: PPRINT-LOGICAL-BLOCK / PPRINT-FILL / PPRINT-LINEAR sharing detection.
+ (from Paul Dietz' test suite)
+
+ CLHS on PPRINT-LINEAR and PPRINT-FILL (and PPRINT-TABULAR, though
+ that's slightly different) states that these functions perform
+ circular and shared structure detection on their object. Therefore,
+
+ a.(let ((*print-circle* t))
+ (pprint-linear *standard-output* (let ((x '(a))) (list x x))))
+ should print "(#1=(A) #1#)"
+
+ b.(let ((*print-circle* t))
+ (pprint-linear *standard-output*
+ (let ((x (cons nil nil))) (setf (cdr x) x) x)))
+ should print "#1=(NIL . #1#)"
+
+ (it is likely that the fault lies in PPRINT-LOGICAL-BLOCK, as
+ suggested by the suggested implementation of PPRINT-TABULAR)
+
+342: PPRINT-TABULAR / PPRINT-LOGICAL-BLOCK logical block start position
+ The logical block introduced by PPRINT-LOGICAL-BLOCK should not
+ include the prefix, so that
+ (pprint-tabular *standard-output* '(1 2 3) t nil 2)
+ should print
+ "(1 2 3)" rather than "(1 2 3)".
+
+343: MOP:COMPUTE-DISCRIMINATING-FUNCTION overriding causes error
+ Even the simplest possible overriding of
+ COMPUTE-DISCRIMINATING-FUNCTION, suggested in the PCL implementation
+ as "canonical", does not work:
+ (defclass my-generic-function (standard-generic-function) ()
+ (:metaclass funcallable-standard-class))
+ (defmethod compute-discriminating-function ((gf my-generic-function))
+ (let ((dfun (call-next-method)))
+ (lambda (&rest args)
+ (apply dfun args))))
+ (defgeneric foo (x)
+ (:generic-function-class my-generic-function))
+ (defmethod foo (x) (+ x x))
+ (foo 5)
+ signals an error. This error is the same even if the LAMBDA is
+ replaced by (FUNCTION (SB-KERNEL:INSTANCE-LAMBDA ...)). Maybe the
+ SET-FUNCALLABLE-INSTANCE-FUN scary stuff in
+ src/code/target-defstruct.lisp is broken? This seems to be broken
+ in CMUCL 18e, so it's not caused by a recent change.
+
+344: more (?) ROOM T problems (possibly part of bug 108)
+ In sbcl-0.8.12.51, and off and on leading up to it, the
+ SB!VM:MEMORY-USAGE operations in ROOM T caused
+ unhandled condition (of type SB-INT:BUG):
+ failed AVER: "(SAP= CURRENT END)"
+ Several clever people have taken a shot at this without fixing
+ it; this time around (before sbcl-0.8.13 release) I (WHN) just
+ commented out the SB!VM:MEMORY-USAGE calls until someone figures
+ out how to make them work reliably with the rest of the GC.
+
+ (Note: there's at least one dubious thing in room.lisp: see the
+ comment in VALID-OBJ)
+
+345: backtrace on x86 undefined function
+ In sbcl-0.8.13 (and probably earlier versions), code of the form
+ (flet ((test () (#:undefined-fun 42)))
+ (funcall #'test))
+ yields the debugger with a poorly-functioning backtrace. Brian
+ Downing fixed most of the problems on non-x86 architectures, but on
+ the x86 the backtrace from this evaluation does not reveal anything
+ about the problem. (See tests in debug.impure.lisp)
+
+346: alpha backtrace
+ In sbcl-0.8.13, all backtraces from errors caused by internal errors
+ on the alpha seem to have a "bogus stack frame".
+
+347: FUNCALL forms and compiler-macros
+ (reported by Johan Bockgård on #lisp)
+ The example
+ (funcall (compiler-macro-function 'square) '(funcall #'square x) nil)
+ => (EXPT X 2)
+ from CLHS entry for DEFINE-COMPILER-MACRO fails in 0.8.13.41 with an
+ error. Fixed in CMUCL 19a.
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff