0.8.13.46: More verbosity and a BUG

            * Add more informative output to make.sh, to direct
               users to build the manual and use install.sh.
            * Record a bug from #lisp.

diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS
index 4d5e3b4..8fb3dc5 100644 (file)
--- a/BUGS
+++ b/BUGS
@@ -1517,9 +1517,6 @@ WORKAROUND:
   method is applicable, and yet matches neither of the method group
   qualifier patterns.
 
-340: SETF of VALUES using too many values
-  (fixed in sbcl-0.8.12.10)
-
 341: PPRINT-LOGICAL-BLOCK / PPRINT-FILL / PPRINT-LINEAR sharing detection.
   (from Paul Dietz' test suite)
 
@@ -1591,3 +1588,11 @@ WORKAROUND:
 346: alpha backtrace
   In sbcl-0.8.13, all backtraces from errors caused by internal errors
   on the alpha seem to have a "bogus stack frame".
+
+347: FUNCALL forms and compiler-macros
+  (reported by Johan Bockgård on #lisp)
+  The example
+    (funcall (compiler-macro-function 'square) '(funcall #'square x) nil) 
+    => (EXPT X 2)
+  from CLHS entry for DEFINE-COMPILER-MACRO fails in 0.8.13.41 with an
+  error. Fixed in CMUCL 19a.

diff --git a/make.sh b/make.sh
index 20c03de..f2e259b 100755 (executable)
--- a/make.sh
+++ b/make.sh
@@ -109,15 +109,32 @@ time sh make-target-contrib.sh || exit 1
 
 # Sometimes people used to see the "No tests failed." output from the last
 # DEFTEST in contrib self-tests and think that's all that is. So...
+FLAG=false
+for dir in contrib/*
+do
+  if [ -d "$dir" -a -e "$dir/Makefile" -a ! -e "$dir/test-passed" ]; then
+      $FLAG || (echo "Failed contribs:" && FLAG=true)
+      echo "  `basename $dir`"
+  fi
+done
+
 NCONTRIBS=`find contrib -name Makefile -print | wc -l`
 NPASSED=`find contrib -name test-passed -print | wc -l`
 
 echo
-echo "The build seems to have finished successfully, including $NPASSED"
-echo "(out of $NCONTRIBS) contributed modules.  If you would like to run" 
-echo "more extensive tests on the new SBCL, you can try"
+echo "The build seems to have finished successfully, including $NPASSED (out of $NCONTRIBS)"
+echo "contributed modules. If you would like to run more extensive tests (but" 
+echo "expect some failures on non-x86 platforms) on the new SBCL, you can try:"
+echo
 echo "  cd tests && sh ./run-tests.sh"
-echo "(but expect some failures on non-x86 platforms)."
+echo
+echo "To build documentation:"
+echo
+echo "  cd doc/manual && make"
+echo
+echo "To install SBCL (more information in INSTALL):"
+echo
+echo "  sh install.sh" 
 
 build_finished=`date`
 echo

diff --git a/version.lisp-expr b/version.lisp-expr
index bc19ddc..fc7e5bc 100644 (file)
--- a/version.lisp-expr
+++ b/version.lisp-expr
@@ -17,4 +17,4 @@
 ;;; checkins which aren't released. (And occasionally for internal
 ;;; versions, especially for internal versions off the main CVS
 ;;; branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
-"0.8.13.45"
+"0.8.13.46"